vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) and CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP (CECO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($205.9M vs $141.2M, roughly 1.5× AtriCure, Inc.). On growth, CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.5% vs 14.3%). Over the past eight quarters, CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (22.4% CAGR vs 10.2%).
AtriCure, Inc. is a global medical device company specializing in the research, development, and manufacturing of innovative surgical tools and therapeutic solutions for treating atrial fibrillation and associated cardiac conditions. Its core customers include hospitals, cardiac surgery centers, and healthcare providers across North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region, with products designed to support safer, more effective minimally invasive cardiac procedures.
CECO Environmental Corp. is an American industrial technology company founded in 1966 and headquartered in Dallas, Texas. It is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the ticker symbol CECO. The company provides air pollution control technology, products, and services for industrial markets, including manufacturing, chemical processing, energy, and refining.
ATRC vs CECO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $141.2M | $205.9M |
| Net Profit | $108.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | 77.4% | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.0% | 0.9% |
| Net Margin | 0.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $141.2M | $205.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.5M | $214.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.3M | $197.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $136.1M | $185.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.6M | $176.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.3M | $158.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.9M | $135.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.3M | $137.5M |
| Q1 26 | $108.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-267.0K | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.2M | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.7M | $36.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.9M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $4.5M |
| Q1 26 | 77.4% | 31.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.0% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 75.5% | 32.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.5% | 36.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 74.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.5% | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 74.9% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.7% | 35.7% |
| Q1 26 | 23.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.2% | 6.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.5% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.9% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.00 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.33 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $146.2M | $45.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $61.0M | $5.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $491.7M | $317.2M |
| Total Assets | $644.0M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.12× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $146.2M | $45.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.4M | $33.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $147.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.8M | $36.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.9M | $146.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.7M | $37.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.3M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.0M | $36.5M |
| Q1 26 | $61.0M | $5.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $212.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $61.9M | $220.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.9M | $238.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.9M | $339.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.9M | $133.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.9M | $130.8M |
| Q1 26 | $491.7M | $317.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $491.9M | $317.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $476.5M | $309.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $464.5M | $298.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.6M | $285.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $461.0M | $247.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $465.0M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $462.1M | $235.0M |
| Q1 26 | $644.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $654.2M | $893.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $635.4M | $891.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $608.8M | $876.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $591.6M | $957.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $609.3M | $759.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $615.1M | $621.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $597.3M | $598.1M |
| Q1 26 | 0.12× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.13× | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.13× | 0.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATRC
| Appendage management | $48.4M | 34% |
| Open ablation | $39.1M | 28% |
| Other | $25.0M | 18% |
| Pain management | $22.4M | 16% |
| Minimally invasive ablation | $6.4M | 5% |
CECO
Segment breakdown not available.
