vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTRONICS CORP (ATRO) and CLEANSPARK, INC. (CLSK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASTRONICS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($240.1M vs $181.2M, roughly 1.3× CLEANSPARK, INC.). On growth, ASTRONICS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.1% vs 11.6%). ASTRONICS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.8M vs $-198.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CLEANSPARK, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (106.4% CAGR vs 13.9%).
Astronics Corporation is an American aerospace electronics corporation founded in 1968, headquartered in East Aurora, New York. It is traded on NASDAQ as Nasdaq: ATRO. It is known for lighting and electronics integrations on military, commercial, and business aircraft and semiconductor test systems.
CleanSpark, Inc. is a U.S.-headquartered sustainable technology company operating two core business segments: low-carbon Bitcoin mining powered primarily by renewable and stranded energy resources, and end-to-end microgrid design, deployment, and operation services for commercial, industrial, and public sector clients across North America.
ATRO vs CLSK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $240.1M | $181.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-378.7M |
| Gross Margin | 33.3% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 14.8% | -174.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -209.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.1% | 11.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -253.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.82 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $240.1M | $181.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $204.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $208.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.7M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $198.1M | $104.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.1M | $111.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-378.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $-62.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $-236.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | $126.7M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | 47.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.1% | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.0% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.7% | 69.3% |
| Q4 25 | 14.8% | -174.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | -73.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.8% | -239.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -209.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | -69.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | -226.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.7% | 113.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.82 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.2M | $458.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $140.1M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $706.7M | $3.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.29× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $458.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $126.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $140.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $266.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $256.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $249.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $257.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $251.7M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $706.7M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $682.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $646.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $662.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $648.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $651.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $630.0M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.6M | $-161.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $15.8M | $-198.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | -109.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 20.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.1M | $-626.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.6M | $-161.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-233.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.3M | $-58.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0M | $-44.8M |
| Q4 25 | $15.8M | $-198.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $-299.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.1M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $439.0K | $-60.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | -109.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | -335.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | -66.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | -54.0% |
| Q4 25 | 4.9% | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 74.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.17× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.08× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.35× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATRO
| Product Line Electrical Power And Motion | $113.8M | 47% |
| Product Line Avionics | $32.0M | 13% |
| Military Aircraft | $28.0M | 12% |
| General Aviation | $22.3M | 9% |
| Government And Defense | $20.5M | 9% |
| Product Line Systems Certification | $13.2M | 6% |
| Product Line Structures | $3.7M | 2% |
| Product Line Other | $2.3M | 1% |
CLSK
Segment breakdown not available.
