vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC (AUBN) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.5M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.3× High Roller Technologies, Inc.). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs 19.7%, a 38.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.4% vs -16.4%). AUBURN NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.9M vs $-90.0K).
Auburn Bank is an American community bank providing services in the East of Alabama as a state registered bank. The Bank offers financial products and services including checking, savings, and lending. The bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Its operation is regulated by the Alabama Superintendent of Banks.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
AUBN vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.5M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $1.7M | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | 19.7% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.7% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.6M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7M | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | -47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.5% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.6% | -48.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.64 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.50 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $92.1M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.0B | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $92.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $89.6M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $86.1M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $78.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.3M | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $996.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $977.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $990.1M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $979.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $12.3M | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $10.9M | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 128.3% | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 17.5% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.42× | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.1M | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 128.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 111.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.83× | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.93× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUBN
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
