vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) and Information Services Group Inc. (III). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($77.1M vs $61.2M, roughly 1.3× Information Services Group Inc.). Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. runs the higher net margin — 273.4% vs 4.4%, a 268.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (28.8% vs 2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.8% CAGR vs -2.4%).
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a late-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for autoimmune and kidney diseases. Its lead approved product is Lupkynis for adult active lupus nephritis treatment, with core operations in North America and European markets, focusing on nephrology and rare immunology therapeutic segments.
EBSCO Information Services, headquartered in Ipswich, Massachusetts, is a division of EBSCO Industries Inc., a private company headquartered in Birmingham, Alabama. EBSCO provides products and services to libraries of many types around the world. Its products include EBSCONET, a complete e-resource management system, and EBSCOhost, which supplies a fee-based online research service with 375 full-text databases, a collection of 600,000-plus ebooks, subject indexes, point-of-care medical refere...
AUPH vs III — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $77.1M | $61.2M |
| Net Profit | $210.8M | $2.7M |
| Gross Margin | 88.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 43.1% | 8.2% |
| Net Margin | 273.4% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 28.8% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14651.2% | 82.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.52 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $77.1M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.5M | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.0M | $61.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.5M | $59.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.9M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.8M | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.2M | $64.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $210.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.3M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $722.0K | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 88.6% | 44.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 88.9% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 89.8% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 86.3% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 90.7% | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 91.1% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 84.4% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.1% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.6% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 273.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.52 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.23 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.10 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.01 | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $80.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $581.3M | — |
| Total Assets | $751.6M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $80.2M | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.9M | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.9M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.1M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.4M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $11.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $581.3M | $94.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $365.8M | $94.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $335.3M | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $350.2M | $95.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | $96.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0M | $96.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $364.6M | $95.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $751.6M | $211.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $527.5M | $213.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $502.6M | $200.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $504.9M | $202.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $550.6M | $204.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $549.4M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $523.5M | $235.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $45.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.22× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.7M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3M | $978.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.1M | $6.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.0M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.8M | $2.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $141.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | 1.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.41× | 3.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.06× | 5.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.06× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.07× | 2.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.19× | 7.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.94× | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUPH
| Products | $74.2M | 96% |
| License Collaboration And Royalty Revenue | $2.9M | 4% |
III
Segment breakdown not available.
