vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) and ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. (RETO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0M vs $1.0M, roughly 1.0× Aurora Innovation, Inc.). ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -131.6% vs -20100.0%, a 19968.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.7M vs $-157.0M).
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. develops and supplies eco-friendly construction materials, environmental remediation services, and solid waste treatment solutions. Its core offerings include recycled construction aggregates, soil improvement products, and ecological restoration systems, primarily serving infrastructure, real estate, and environmental conservation sectors across the Chinese market.
AUR vs RETO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Net Profit | $-201.0M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.7% |
| Operating Margin | -22200.0% | -133.0% |
| Net Margin | -20100.0% | -131.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 36.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | -103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $768.4K | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-201.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-201.0M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-208.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-182.0M | $-678.5K | ||
| Q2 23 | $-218.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-196.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-198.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -22200.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -23000.0% | -133.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -68.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -6903.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -20100.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -20100.0% | -131.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -6834.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.0M | $2.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $30.4M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $41.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | $785.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $966.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $1.2B | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $30.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.0B | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-149.0M | $-1.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.0M | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15700.0% | -157.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 800.0% | 5.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-645.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-149.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-176.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-182.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-136.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-508.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-142.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-150.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-186.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-138.0M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-523.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-145.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -15700.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15100.0% | -157.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -24869.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -5005.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | 800.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 700.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 713.3% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 103.6% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
