vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.9M vs $21.2M, roughly 1.3× Autolus Therapeutics plc). Hyperscale Data, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -112.0% vs -373.3%, a 261.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. Hyperscale Data, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-56.2M vs $-72.3M).
Autolus Therapeutics plc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in the development of next-generation engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. It operates in the global oncology biotech market, advancing a pipeline of targeted immunotherapy candidates across multiple clinical development stages.
Hyperscale Data, Inc. provides GPU-accelerated computing infrastructure and cloud solutions tailored for AI development, big data processing, and high-performance computing workloads. It primarily serves AI startups, large technology firms, and cloud service providers across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, delivering scalable, high-efficiency computing resources to support complex data processing needs.
AUTL vs GPUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.2M | $26.9M |
| Net Profit | $-79.1M | $-30.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | -337.9% | -117.8% |
| Net Margin | -373.3% | -112.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 38.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -6670.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $25.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | $25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $17.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-30.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-79.1M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.9M | $-19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-70.2M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-445.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.1M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.3M | $-33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.7M | $3.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 47.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -117.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -337.9% | -57.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -292.6% | -39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -726.3% | -25.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -79.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -151.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -384.1% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -112.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -373.3% | -53.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -229.0% | -73.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -781.1% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -82.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -190.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -522.1% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $-2.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-8.78 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.31 | $-24.82 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $-37.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | $3.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.1M | $13.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $83.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.5M | $119.8M |
| Total Assets | $661.9M | $313.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.1M | $24.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.8M | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $657.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $705.9M | $9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $758.5M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $83.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $88.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $119.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.5M | $55.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.5M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.8M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $582.0M | $59.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $313.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $661.9M | $242.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $721.0M | $213.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $746.3M | $218.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.5M | $231.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.6M | $270.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.4M | $299.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-67.9M | $-37.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-72.3M | $-56.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -341.2% | -208.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.8% | 68.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-322.5M | $-87.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-37.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-67.9M | $-17.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.8M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-75.6M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-76.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.1M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.5M | $-10.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-56.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-72.3M | $-20.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-80.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.8M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.3M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.9M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.0M | $-11.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | -208.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -341.2% | -84.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -382.6% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -933.1% | -27.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -47.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -406.8% | -30.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 68.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.8% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUTL
Segment breakdown not available.
GPUS
| Transferred Over Time | $10.4M | 39% |
| Revenue From Mined Crypto Assets At Sentinum Owned And Operated Facilities | $5.8M | 21% |
| Hotel And Real Estate Operations | $4.8M | 18% |
| Other | $4.0M | 15% |
| Turn On Green | $2.0M | 7% |
