vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. (OST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Autolus Therapeutics plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.2M vs $20.8M, roughly 1.0× Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd.). Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -24.8% vs -373.3%, a 348.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Autolus Therapeutics plc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in the development of next-generation engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. It operates in the global oncology biotech market, advancing a pipeline of targeted immunotherapy candidates across multiple clinical development stages.
Ostin Technology Group Co., Ltd. is a provider of display and interactive technology solutions. It develops and manufactures touch panels, interactive whiteboards and custom display modules, serving consumer electronics, education and commercial segments across Asia Pacific, North America and European markets.
AUTL vs OST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.2M | $20.8M |
| Net Profit | $-79.1M | $-5.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.1% |
| Operating Margin | -337.9% | -23.4% |
| Net Margin | -373.3% | -24.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 39.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | -11.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $-2.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | $20.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $15.0M |
| Q3 25 | $-79.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-70.2M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.7M | $-4.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q3 25 | -337.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -292.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -726.3% | -23.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -384.1% | -25.3% |
| Q3 25 | -373.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -229.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -781.1% | -24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -522.1% | -31.0% |
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | $-2.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | $-0.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.1M | $1.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.5M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $661.9M | $52.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $86.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.8M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $657.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $705.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $758.5M | $1.7M |
| Q3 25 | $265.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $582.0M | $10.3M |
| Q3 25 | $661.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $721.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $746.3M | $52.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.4M | $51.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-67.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-72.3M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -341.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-322.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-67.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-75.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-76.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.5M | $-3.9M |
| Q3 25 | $-72.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-80.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.0M | $-4.5M |
| Q3 25 | -341.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -382.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -933.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -406.8% | -30.1% |
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 4.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
