vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Autolus Therapeutics plc (AUTL) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $21.2M, roughly 1.9× Autolus Therapeutics plc). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -373.3%, a 428.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-72.3M).
Autolus Therapeutics plc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in the development of next-generation engineered chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for the treatment of hematological malignancies and solid tumors. It operates in the global oncology biotech market, advancing a pipeline of targeted immunotherapy candidates across multiple clinical development stages.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
AUTL vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.2M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-79.1M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -337.9% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -373.3% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.6% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.1M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-79.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-47.9M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-70.2M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-82.1M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-58.3M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.7M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -337.9% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -292.6% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -726.3% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -384.1% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -373.3% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -229.0% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -781.1% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -522.1% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.30 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.26 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.31 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.24 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.1M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $265.5M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $661.9M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.1M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $123.8M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.8M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $657.1M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $705.9M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $758.5M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $265.5M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.5M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $371.1M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $477.0M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $527.8M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $582.0M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $661.9M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $721.0M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $746.3M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $827.5M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.6M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.4M | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-67.9M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-72.3M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -341.2% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.8% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-322.5M | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-67.9M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.8M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-75.6M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-76.7M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.5M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-72.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-80.1M | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.8M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-86.3M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-51.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.0M | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -341.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -382.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -933.1% | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -406.8% | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.8% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AUTL
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
