vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AvalonBay Communities (AVB) and Genius Sports Ltd (GENI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AvalonBay Communities is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($767.9M vs $510.9M, roughly 1.5× Genius Sports Ltd). AvalonBay Communities runs the higher net margin — 9040.6% vs -12.3%, a 9052.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. AvalonBay Communities produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.4B vs $69.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Genius Sports Ltd's revenue compounded faster (129.2% CAGR vs 3.8%).
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in apartments.
Genius Sports is a sports data and technology company that provides data management, video streaming and integrity services to sports leagues, bookmakers and media companies.
AVB vs GENI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $767.9M | $510.9M |
| Net Profit | $166.0M | $-63.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.2% |
| Operating Margin | 64.2% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 9040.6% | -12.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -41.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $767.9M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $766.8M | $335.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $760.2M | $215.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.9M | $119.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.5M | $413.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $734.3M | $285.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $726.0M | $184.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $712.9M | $97.2M |
| Q4 25 | $166.0M | $-63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $381.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $268.7M | $-47.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $236.6M | $-25.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.1M | $-85.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $372.5M | $-47.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $253.9M | $-35.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $173.4M | $-25.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.8% |
| Q4 25 | 64.2% | -11.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 65.7% | -15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.6% | -21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 68.5% | -20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.1% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.4% | -13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.6% | -16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.2% | -23.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9040.6% | -12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | -22.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | -21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.7% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.0% | -19.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.3% | -25.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.68 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.88 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.66 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.99 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.61 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.78 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.22 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $187.2M | $280.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $11.6B | $724.5M |
| Total Assets | $22.2B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.80× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $187.2M | $280.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $123.3M | $110.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.8M | $110.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.3M | $110.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.6M | $100.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $552.4M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $545.8M | $100.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.9M | $100.3M |
| Q4 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.6B | $724.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9B | $572.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.9B | $572.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $572.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9B | $573.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $573.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.7B | $573.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7B | $573.0M |
| Q4 25 | $22.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.9B | $792.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8B | $792.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2B | $792.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0B | $775.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.3B | $775.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.0B | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6B | $775.7M |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7B | $81.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.4B | $69.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 183.5% | 13.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 34.1% | 2.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 10.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $2.5B | $33.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $81.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $477.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $377.8M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $415.9M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $14.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $486.2M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $380.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $412.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $69.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.2M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $317.1M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $367.5M | $-16.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $11.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $434.2M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $375.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | 183.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.7% | -2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.3% | -13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 191.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.1% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 52.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 34.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.38× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.