vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Avidia Bancorp, Inc. (AVBC) and Guardforce AI Co., Ltd. (GFAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Avidia Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.8M vs $18.0M, roughly 1.5× Guardforce AI Co., Ltd.). Avidia Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs -76.9%, a 99.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Avidia Bank is an American mutual community bank headquartered in Hudson, Massachusetts. It was founded in 2007 when it was formed by a merger between Hudson Savings Bank and Westborough Bank.
Guardforce AI Co., Ltd. is a global provider of AI-integrated security solutions. Its core offerings include intelligent surveillance systems, AI-powered access control, autonomous security robots, and smart logistics monitoring services, serving enterprise, retail, financial and public sector clients across Asia, Europe and North America.
AVBC vs GFAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.8M | $18.0M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-13.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | -66.1% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | -76.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -118.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-4.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $16.9M |
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-907.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-13.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-6.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 11.5% |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -72.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -66.1% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -32.8% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.5% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -76.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -37.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-4.35 | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-7.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $275.0M | $24.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $379.0M | $25.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $64.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $275.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $7.7M |
| Q4 25 | $379.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $29.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $64.1M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $68.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.4M | $-1.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 89.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $-13.8M |
| Q4 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
