vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Avidia Bancorp, Inc. (AVBC) and GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP (GOOD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($43.5M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.6× Avidia Bancorp, Inc.). Avidia Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs 12.4%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Avidia Bank is an American mutual community bank headquartered in Hudson, Massachusetts. It was founded in 2007 when it was formed by a merger between Hudson Savings Bank and Westborough Bank.
Gladstone Commercial Corp is a publicly traded US real estate investment trust focused on acquiring, owning, and operating diversified industrial and commercial properties. It offers long-term net lease agreements to tenants across manufacturing, logistics, healthcare and professional services sectors, mainly serving small to mid-sized business clients.
AVBC vs GOOD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.8M | $43.5M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $5.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | — |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 16.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -25.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.8M | $43.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $39.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9M | $37.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $35.7M |
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-907.0K | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -72.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $275.0M | $10.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $843.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $379.0M | $171.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 4.91× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $275.0M | $10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.3M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.5M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $843.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $843.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $794.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $740.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $693.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $692.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $722.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $719.4M |
| Q4 25 | $379.0M | $171.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.0M | $184.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.4M | $177.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.1M | $183.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $171.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.3M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.96× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.4M | $88.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 89.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.32× | 16.38× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.4M | $88.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1M | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $17.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.32× | 16.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.60× | 7.74× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
