vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. (AVNW) and BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($111.5M vs $3.9M, roughly 28.9× BT Brands, Inc.). BT Brands, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 23.7%, a 18.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.7% vs -11.4%). AVIAT NETWORKS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($22.5M vs $261.8K). Over the past eight quarters, AVIAT NETWORKS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Aviat Networks, Inc. is a global provider of microwave transport and backhaul solutions, providing public and private operators with communications infrastructure to serve telecommunications operators and enterprise customers.
BT Group plc is a British multinational telecommunications holding company headquartered in London, England. It has operations in around 180 countries and is the largest provider of fixed-line, broadband and mobile services in the UK, and also provides subscription television and IT services.
AVNW vs BTBD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $111.5M | $3.9M |
| Net Profit | $5.7M | $915.0K |
| Gross Margin | 32.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | 19.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 23.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.7% | -11.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.2% | 516.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $111.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.3M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.3M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $118.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.7M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.8M | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $915.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $55.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5M | $-329.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.9M | $-219.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $-70.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9M | $-445.7K |
| Q4 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 32.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | -9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.6% | -1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | -19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.4% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | -14.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.01 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.35 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.94 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.30 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $86.5M | $3.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $105.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $271.6M | $7.7M |
| Total Assets | $659.4M | $11.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.39× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.2M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $105.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $271.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $263.6M | $7.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $263.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $256.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $247.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $256.0M | $8.8M |
| Q4 25 | $659.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $643.3M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $633.3M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $628.3M | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $594.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $590.9M | $13.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $535.2M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $490.3M | $14.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.40× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.19× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $23.9M | $325.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.5M | $261.8K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.2% | 6.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.3% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 4.18× | 0.36× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $16.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $23.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.7M | $325.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $384.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $-306.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-27.2M | $129.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3M | $82.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.3M | $-408.9K |
| Q4 25 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.5M | $261.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-431.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-32.6M | $50.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $53.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8M | $-521.3K |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.6% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.0% | -13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -36.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.4% | -16.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 4.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -72.48× | 0.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.02× | 6.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.62× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.96× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVNW
| Products | $81.2M | 73% |
| Services | $30.3M | 27% |
BTBD
Segment breakdown not available.
