vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. (BBBY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mission Produce, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($319.0M vs $247.8M, roughly 1.3× BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.). Mission Produce, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -6.6%, a 11.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BED BATH & BEYOND, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.9% vs -10.0%). Mission Produce, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.6M vs $-12.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Mission Produce, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.0% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Mission Produce, Inc.AVOEarnings & Financial Report
Produce Co., Ltd. was a Japanese video game company. Founded on April 6, 1990 by former Irem employees, it developed a number of games for both Enix and Hudson Soft. Produce! have created games for arcades and for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo 64, PlayStation, and PC Engine systems.
Bed Bath & Beyond was an American big-box retail chain specializing in housewares, furniture, and specialty items. Headquartered in Union, New Jersey, the chain operated stores in the United States and Canada, and was once counted among the Fortune 500 and the Forbes Global 2000. The chain filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2023 and liquidated all of its remaining stores, with the last closing on July 30, 2023. Following the retail chain's liquidation, its name was adopted by online ret...
AVO vs BBBY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $319.0M | $247.8M |
| Net Profit | $16.0M | $-16.4M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 68.8% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | -6.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | 58.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $-0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $319.0M | $273.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $357.7M | $257.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.3M | $282.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.2M | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $354.4M | $303.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.0M | $311.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.6M | $398.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-16.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $-20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $-19.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-39.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $-81.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | $-61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $-42.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 25.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 68.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | -14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | -11.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -17.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | -26.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | -19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | -10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $-0.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $-1.33 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.93 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.8M | $135.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $95.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $587.3M | $202.5M |
| Total Assets | $983.0M | $404.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $135.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.8M | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.7M | $167.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.7M | $120.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $114.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0M | $159.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $140.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.2M | $186.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $202.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $587.3M | $217.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.7M | $202.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.3M | $130.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $550.8M | $143.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $547.3M | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $527.3M | $196.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $513.3M | $250.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $983.0M | $425.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $414.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $358.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $997.8M | $363.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $971.5M | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $959.9M | $428.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $966.9M | $496.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $67.2M | $-11.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.6M | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.4% | -5.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.20× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.2M | $-24.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.2M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.8M | $15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-50.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.5M | $-42.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $-75.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $-52.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.1M | $-24.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9M | $-45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $-80.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | -22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | -8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | -14.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.5% | -20.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVO
| Avocado | $256.9M | 81% |
| Blueberry | $36.5M | 11% |
| Mango | $18.7M | 6% |
| Other | $6.9M | 2% |
BBBY
Segment breakdown not available.
