vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC (KLIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mission Produce, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($319.0M vs $199.6M, roughly 1.6× KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC). KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 8.4% vs 5.0%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.2% vs -10.0%). Mission Produce, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.6M vs $-11.6M).
Mission Produce, Inc.AVOEarnings & Financial Report
Produce Co., Ltd. was a Japanese video game company. Founded on April 6, 1990 by former Irem employees, it developed a number of games for both Enix and Hudson Soft. Produce! have created games for arcades and for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo 64, PlayStation, and PC Engine systems.
Kulicke & Soffa Industries Inc. is a leading global provider of semiconductor packaging and assembly equipment, materials, and process solutions. It serves semiconductor manufacturers across automotive electronics, consumer devices, industrial systems, and high-performance computing markets, with core offerings covering wire bonding and advanced packaging technologies.
AVO vs KLIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $319.0M | $199.6M |
| Net Profit | $16.0M | $16.8M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 49.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 8.9% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 8.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | 20.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | -79.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $319.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $357.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $354.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.8M | $481.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $95.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $587.3M | $825.0M |
| Total Assets | $983.0M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $481.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $64.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $825.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $587.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $550.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $547.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $527.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $513.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $983.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $997.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $971.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $959.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $966.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $67.2M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.6M | $-11.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.4% | -5.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.20× | -0.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-11.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -5.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVO
| Avocado | $256.9M | 81% |
| Blueberry | $36.5M | 11% |
| Mango | $18.7M | 6% |
| Other | $6.9M | 2% |
KLIC
| Ball Bonding Equipment Segment | $110.3M | 55% |
| Aftermarket Products And Services APS Segment Post Cessation | $45.1M | 23% |
| Wedge Bonding Equipment Segment | $21.1M | 11% |
| Automotiveand Industrial | $13.6M | 7% |
| All Others Segment | $11.4M | 6% |
