vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and Smith Douglas Homes Corp. (SDHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mission Produce, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($319.0M vs $260.4M, roughly 1.2× Smith Douglas Homes Corp.). Mission Produce, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs 1.4%, a 3.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Smith Douglas Homes Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.4% vs -10.0%). Mission Produce, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($55.6M vs $8.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Smith Douglas Homes Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (17.3% CAGR vs 11.0%).
Mission Produce, Inc.AVOEarnings & Financial Report
Produce Co., Ltd. was a Japanese video game company. Founded on April 6, 1990 by former Irem employees, it developed a number of games for both Enix and Hudson Soft. Produce! have created games for arcades and for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo 64, PlayStation, and PC Engine systems.
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (S&W) is an American firearm manufacturer headquartered in Maryville, Tennessee, United States.
AVO vs SDHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $319.0M | $260.4M |
| Net Profit | $16.0M | $3.5M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | -9.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | -14.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $319.0M | $260.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $357.7M | $262.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.3M | $223.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.2M | $224.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $354.4M | $287.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.0M | $277.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.6M | $220.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.7M | $189.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 26.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 26.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 11.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | $0.39 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.33 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.8M | $12.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $95.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $587.3M | $86.7M |
| Total Assets | $983.0M | $557.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.8M | $12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.7M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.7M | $16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.2M | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.9M | $32.8M |
| Q4 25 | $95.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $156.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $587.3M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.7M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.3M | $80.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $550.8M | $76.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $547.3M | $73.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $527.3M | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $513.3M | $62.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.1M | $59.7M |
| Q4 25 | $983.0M | $557.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $571.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $570.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $997.8M | $513.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $971.5M | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $959.9M | $460.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $966.9M | $429.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $937.5M | $401.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $67.2M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.6M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.4% | 3.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | 0.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.20× | 2.77× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.2M | $-36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $67.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.8M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $-34.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.5M | $22.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $39.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $21.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.0M | $-31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $-35.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-400.0K | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | -13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | -16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.5% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | -5.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 10.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.81× | -12.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.31× | -13.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.43× | 4.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVO
| Avocado | $256.9M | 81% |
| Blueberry | $36.5M | 11% |
| Mango | $18.7M | 6% |
| Other | $6.9M | 2% |
SDHC
| Southeast | $164.7M | 63% |
| Central | $95.8M | 37% |
