vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and Bio-Techne (TECH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Mission Produce, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($319.0M vs $295.9M, roughly 1.1× Bio-Techne). Bio-Techne runs the higher net margin — 12.8% vs 5.0%, a 7.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bio-Techne posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.4% vs -10.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Mission Produce, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.0% CAGR vs 4.2%).
Mission Produce, Inc.AVOEarnings & Financial Report
Produce Co., Ltd. was a Japanese video game company. Founded on April 6, 1990 by former Irem employees, it developed a number of games for both Enix and Hudson Soft. Produce! have created games for arcades and for the Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Nintendo 64, PlayStation, and PC Engine systems.
Bio-Techne Corporation is an American life sciences company that develops, manufactures and sells life science reagents, instruments and services for the research, diagnostic, and bioprocessing markets.
AVO vs TECH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $319.0M | $295.9M |
| Net Profit | $16.0M | $38.0M |
| Gross Margin | 17.5% | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 18.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.0% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.0% | -6.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -7.5% | 68.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $319.0M | $295.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $357.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $380.3M | $317.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.2M | $316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $354.4M | $297.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.0M | $289.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.6M | $306.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $258.7M | $303.4M |
| Q4 25 | $16.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1M | $-17.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $22.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $34.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.4M | $33.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | $49.1M |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 64.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 62.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 67.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 65.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.4% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 66.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.1% | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | -7.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.1% | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.04 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.31 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $64.8M | $172.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $95.8M | $260.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $587.3M | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $983.0M | $2.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.16× | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.8M | $172.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.7M | $162.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.1M | $140.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0M | $177.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $187.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.2M | $152.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.9M | $145.3M |
| Q4 25 | $95.8M | $260.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.2M | $346.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $117.9M | $330.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.7M | $300.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $134.4M | $300.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $170.2M | $319.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $156.1M | $389.0M |
| Q4 25 | $587.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $568.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $552.3M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $550.8M | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $547.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $527.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $513.3M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.1M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $983.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $997.8M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $971.5M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $959.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $966.9M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $937.5M | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.27× | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.21× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.21× | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.25× | 0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $67.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $55.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.20× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $67.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.8M | $98.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.2M | $41.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.5M | $63.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4M | $75.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.5M | $81.0M |
| Q4 25 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.0M | $93.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.0M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.1M | $77.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9M | $54.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | $57.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-400.0K | $64.5M |
| Q4 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 18.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.8% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.31× | 1.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.20× | 2.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.43× | 1.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.49× | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVO
| Avocado | $256.9M | 81% |
| Blueberry | $36.5M | 11% |
| Mango | $18.7M | 6% |
| Other | $6.9M | 2% |
TECH
| Diagnostics And Spatial Biology | $81.2M | 27% |
| EMEA Excluding UK | $75.4M | 25% |
| Other | $42.4M | 14% |
| Instruments | $29.6M | 10% |
| APAC Excluding Greater China | $22.7M | 8% |
| Services | $22.3M | 8% |
| GB | $13.7M | 5% |
| Royalty | $8.5M | 3% |
