vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AVAX ONE TECHNOLOGY LTD. (AVX) and PAVmed Inc. (PAVM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AVAX ONE TECHNOLOGY LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0M vs $996.0K, roughly 1.0× PAVmed Inc.). PAVmed Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6465.8% vs -1633.6%, a 8099.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
PAVmed Inc. is a commercial-stage medical technology company that designs, develops and commercializes innovative diagnostic and therapeutic medical products. Its portfolio covers point-of-care diagnostics, interventional oncology and gastroenterology solutions, primarily serving healthcare providers and patients across the United States.
AVX vs PAVM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $996.0K |
| Net Profit | $-16.6M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | -38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1522.1% | -1162.4% |
| Net Margin | -1633.6% | 6465.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 25.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -480.2% | 464.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $32.17 | $1.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $525.9K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $452.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.4K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $996.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3K | $979.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-16.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-145.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.8M | $64.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.2M | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-14.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -38.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.4% | -70.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -72.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -53.5% |
| Q4 25 | -1522.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -496.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -328.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -600.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1162.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2827.7% | -1397.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1389.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -1561.7% |
| Q4 25 | -1633.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1588.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1783.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6465.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10243.5% | -1105.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1506.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -1338.0% |
| Q4 25 | $32.17 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.55 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.60 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.19 | $1.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-83.03 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.62 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $22.1M | $765.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $187.0M | $-4.9M |
| Total Assets | $195.0M | $30.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $22.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $894.7K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.3K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $765.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $187.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.7M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $-73.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-68.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-53.8M |
| Q4 25 | $195.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.7M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.4M | $-8.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -892.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-45.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-14.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-884.1K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-919.2K | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-11.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-12.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -892.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1190.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1302.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -1149.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.