vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Avery Dennison (AVY) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Avery Dennison is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $1.7B, roughly 1.4× Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.). Avery Dennison runs the higher net margin — 7.3% vs 5.9%, a 1.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 7.0%).
Avery Dennison Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and distributor of pressure-sensitive adhesive materials, apparel branding labels and tags, RFID inlays, and specialty medical products. The company is a member of the Fortune 500 and is headquartered in Mentor, Ohio.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.BEPEarnings & Financial Report
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
AVY vs BEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $1.7B |
| Net Profit | $168.1M | $100.0M |
| Gross Margin | 28.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 10.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 7.3% | 5.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 14.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.1% | 213.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $168.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $166.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $189.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $174.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $181.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $176.8M | $-88.0M |
| Q1 26 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.5% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.9% | -5.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.16 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.13 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.41 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.25 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.18 | $-0.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $255.1M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $33.3B |
| Total Assets | $9.0B | $98.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.38× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $255.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $202.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $536.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.9M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $195.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $212.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.8M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $33.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $28.0B |
| Q1 26 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $98.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.3B | $73.8B |
| Q1 26 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.89× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $379.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $104.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $869.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $376.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $312.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $208.8M | $379.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $270.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $197.7M | $231.0M |
| Q1 26 | $104.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $309.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $276.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $178.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $281.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $227.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.88× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.10× | 3.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVY
| Materials Group | $1.6B | 72% |
| Solutions Group | $649.2M | 28% |
BEP
Segment breakdown not available.
