vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC (AWI) and CRH PUBLIC LTD CO (CRH), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CRH PUBLIC LTD CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.4B vs $388.3M, roughly 24.2× ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC). ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC runs the higher net margin — 16.9% vs 10.9%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CRH PUBLIC LTD CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs 5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, CRH PUBLIC LTD CO's revenue compounded faster (20.1% CAGR vs 9.1%).
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. is an international designer and manufacturer of wall and ceiling building materials based in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. As of 2014, AWI had 3,100 employees and a global manufacturing network of 17 facilities, down from 26, including nine plants dedicated to its WAVE joint venture, in 2012.
CRH plc is a building materials provider headquartered in Dublin. CRH produces construction materials, primarily aggregates and cement, and manufactures ready-mixed concrete, asphalt concrete, and infrastructural components, of which it is one of the largest suppliers in North America. CRH operates with 3,816 locations in 28 countries in North America, Europe, Australia, and the Philippines.
AWI vs CRH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $388.3M | $9.4B |
| Net Profit | $65.5M | $1.0B |
| Gross Margin | 39.8% | 35.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.7% | 14.9% |
| Net Margin | 16.9% | 10.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.3% | 45.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.51 | $1.51 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $388.3M | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $425.2M | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.6M | $10.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $382.7M | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $367.7M | $8.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $386.6M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $365.1M | $9.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $326.3M | $6.5B |
| Q4 25 | $65.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.1M | $-94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $703.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $76.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.9M | $116.0M |
| Q4 25 | 39.8% | 35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.0% | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 27.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.1% | 35.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.9% | 38.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.1% | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.8% | 18.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.0% | 18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.4% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.4% | 1.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.98 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.01 | $1.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.58 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.41 | $1.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.75 | $1.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.50 | $1.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.36 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $112.7M | $4.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $17.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $900.7M | $24.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.9B | $58.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.73× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $112.7M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $90.1M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $82.8M | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.3M | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.7M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.6M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $69.6M | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $17.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.6B |
| Q4 25 | $900.7M | $24.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $889.2M | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $837.8M | $22.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $793.4M | $21.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $757.1M | $21.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $717.0M | $21.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $669.0M | $20.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $626.8M | $20.0B |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $58.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $58.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $54.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $51.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $50.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $51.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $48.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $46.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $110.0M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $62.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 16.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 12.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.68× | 2.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $246.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $110.0M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.9M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.0M | $-659.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.5M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $-712.0M |
| Q4 25 | $62.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $61.7M | $723.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.9M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.1M | $981.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.4M | $861.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $-1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | -19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.7% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | -18.6% |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 7.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.68× | 2.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.42× | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.39× | 3.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.87× | 1.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.44× | -6.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AWI
| Distributors | $183.0M | 47% |
| Architectural Specialties | $143.7M | 37% |
| Home Centers | $27.2M | 7% |
| Retailers And Other | $21.7M | 6% |
| Direct Customers | $12.7M | 3% |
CRH
| Products | $7.1B | 76% |
| Essential Materials | $1.4B | 15% |
| Outdoor Living Solutions | $842.0M | 9% |
