vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN STATES WATER CO (AWR) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $164.3M, roughly 1.6× AMERICAN STATES WATER CO). AMERICAN STATES WATER CO runs the higher net margin — 17.5% vs 0.7%, a 16.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN STATES WATER CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.8% vs -16.5%). HUTCHMED (China) Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.4M vs $-36.0M).
American Water is an American public utility company that, through its subsidiaries, provides water and wastewater services in the United States.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
AWR vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $164.3M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $28.7M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 88.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 27.4% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.5% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.8% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1.1% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.74 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $164.3M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.1M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.0M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $155.3M | $305.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $28.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.7M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.9M | $25.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 88.9% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 91.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 92.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 91.3% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 92.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 89.6% | 41.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 88.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 27.4% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.8% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.3% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.7% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.74 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.87 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.95 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.85 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.62 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.8M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $782.7M | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.75× | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6M | $802.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $782.7M | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $972.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $956.4M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $920.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $879.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $833.5M | $740.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $800.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $27.7M | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-36.0M | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -21.9% | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 38.8% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.96× | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-7.1M | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $27.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.6M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.1M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.7M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-36.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.7M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.5M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-478.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.0M | $-49.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | -21.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.8% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.96× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.92× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.68× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.78× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.78× | -1.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AWR
| Water Service Utility Operations | $110.0M | 67% |
| Public Utilities Inventory Water | $22.3M | 14% |
| Wastewater | $15.9M | 10% |
| Electric Service Utility Operations | $15.2M | 9% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
