vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMREP CORP. (AXR) and BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC. (BHST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMREP CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $8.4M, roughly 1.7× BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC.).
AMREP Corporation is a real estate and media services company based in Princeton, New Jersey, in the United States. It was founded in 1961 as The American Realty and Petroleum Corporation.
BioHarvest Sciences Inc. is a biotechnology firm that develops and produces sustainable, high-purity plant-derived bioactive ingredients. It serves the nutraceutical, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical sectors, leveraging proprietary cell cultivation technology to create efficacious natural products without large-scale agricultural farming.
AXR vs BHST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $8.4M |
| Net Profit | $3.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 93.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 338.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $7.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5M | $6.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $717.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 58.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $139.4M | — |
| Total Assets | $143.9M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $21.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | $139.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $20.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-182.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -45.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.51× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
