vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMREP CORP. (AXR) and SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC. (OPTX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMREP CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.6M vs $7.5M, roughly 1.9× SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC.). AMREP CORP. runs the higher net margin — 21.6% vs -4.6%, a 26.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMREP CORP. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (93.8% vs 2.5%). AMREP CORP. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.4M vs $-4.4K). Over the past eight quarters, SYNTEC OPTICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -13.6%).
AMREP Corporation is a real estate and media services company based in Princeton, New Jersey, in the United States. It was founded in 1961 as The American Realty and Petroleum Corporation.
AXR vs OPTX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.6M | $7.5M |
| Net Profit | $3.1M | $-343.8K |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 20.6% | 4.2% |
| Net Margin | 21.6% | -4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 93.8% | 2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 338.9% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.58 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $6.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5M | $7.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2M | $-343.8K | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $-343.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $717.0K | $323.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1M | $-13.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $281.8K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.0% |
| Q1 26 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.9% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.4% | -17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.4% | -19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.3% | -20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.8% | -5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.9% | -21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.22 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.73 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.75 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.0K | $2.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $139.4M | $9.5M |
| Total Assets | $143.9M | $24.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $21.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.0K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.0K | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.0K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0K | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.0K | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0K | $2.8M |
| Q1 26 | $139.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $136.0M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $134.7M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.0M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.1M | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.2M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.0M | $12.1M |
| Q1 26 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.1M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.7M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.8M | $25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $128.9M | $26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.0M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.8M | $25.8M |
| Q1 26 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 0.28× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | 0.23× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $-3.9K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $5.4M | $-4.4K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 37.0% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.72× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $20.2M | $28.3K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $-3.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $535.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-158.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.2M | $299.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-182.0K | $623.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $417.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.7M | $-1.7M |
| Q1 26 | $5.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.3M | $-4.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.5M | $496.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $-548.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3M | $84.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-268.0K | $12.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $43.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3M | $-1.9M |
| Q1 26 | 37.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -45.9% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.2% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.4% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -43.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.54× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.51× | 0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.59× | -6.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.