vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD (AXS) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.2× AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD). AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 5.3%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.0% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, AXIS CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD's revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs -8.6%).
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited is the holding company for AXIS group of companies. It offers various risk transfer products and services through subsidiaries and branch networks in Bermuda, the United States, Canada, Europe and Singapore. The company offers insurance services including property, professional lines, terrorism, marine, energy, environmental and other insurance. The reinsurance services include property, professional lines, credit and bond, and others.
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
AXS vs EMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $254.8M | $105.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.0% | -13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 31.3% | -42.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $254.8M | $105.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.6M | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $301.9M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $223.4M | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.1M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $293.6M | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.7M | $180.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $212.0M | $230.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.6% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.0% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.63 | $0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.74 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.72 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.26 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.38 | $2.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.04 | $1.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.40 | $1.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $862.5M | $566.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.4B | $6.0B |
| Total Assets | $35.6B | $14.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $862.5M | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $820.3M | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $825.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $852.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $837.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $981.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | $35.6B | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.5B | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.3B | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.2B | $15.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.2B | $15.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.5B | $15.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.7B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.1B | $14.9B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
