vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and Medtronic (MDT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Medtronic is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.0B vs $5.1B, roughly 1.8× Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.). Medtronic runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 1.8%, a 13.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Medtronic posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -0.6%). Medtronic produced more free cash flow last quarter ($457.0M vs $21.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (94.5% CAGR vs 5.3%).
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd., also known as simply Axalta, is an American company specializing in coatings in a wide variety of industrial applications, materials and sectors, including automotive paints. The company is based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and incorporated in Bermuda. Axalta develops and manufactures coatings for light and commercial vehicles, industrial, and refinish applications. The firm does business in 130 countries, has nearly 13,000 employees, and has more than 100,000 ...
Medtronic plc is an Irish medical device company. The company's legal and executive headquarters are in Ireland, while its operational headquarters are in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Medtronic rebased to Ireland following its acquisition of Irish-based Covidien in 2015. While it primarily operates in the United States, it operates in more than 150 countries and employs over 90,000 people. It develops and manufactures healthcare technologies and therapies.
AXTA vs MDT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.1B | $9.0B |
| Net Profit | $91.0M | $1.4B |
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | 65.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 18.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 15.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 8.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $1.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $8.6B |
| Q1 26 | $91.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $654.0M |
| Q1 26 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | 65.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 65.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 64.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.3% | 66.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | 64.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 65.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 64.5% |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 16.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 7.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.28 | $1.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.51 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.63 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $608.0M | $8.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | $27.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $48.7B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $91.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $608.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $657.0M | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $606.0M | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.0M | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $575.0M | $7.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $593.0M | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $840.0M | $8.0B |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $27.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $26.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $25.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $24.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $24.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $26.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $23.9B |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $48.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $47.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $48.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $49.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $48.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $47.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $50.2B |
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $91.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $91.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $91.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $90.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $90.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $89.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $90.0B |
| Q1 26 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | 0.57× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.48× | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.50× | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.84× | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.02× | 0.48× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $925.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $457.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 5.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $491.0M | $5.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | $925.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $234.0M | $958.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.0M | $986.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.0M | $2.8B |
| Q1 26 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $286.0M | $457.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $584.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.0M | $554.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $466.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.0M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 27.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.73× | 0.67× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | 1.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 0.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 4.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXTA
Segment breakdown not available.
MDT
| Cardiac Rhythm And Heart Failure Division | $1.8B | 20% |
| Surgical Endoscopy | $1.7B | 19% |
| Other | $1.3B | 14% |
| Structural Heart And Aortic Division | $956.0M | 11% |
| Diabetes Group | $757.0M | 8% |
| Specialty Therapies Division | $744.0M | 8% |
| Coronary And Peripheral Vascular Division | $655.0M | 7% |
| Neuromodulation Division | $520.0M | 6% |
| Acute Care Monitoring | $493.0M | 6% |
| IE | $35.0M | 0% |