vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and Republic Services (RSG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.1B vs $4.1B, roughly 1.2× Republic Services). Republic Services runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 1.8%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Republic Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -0.6%). Republic Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($404.0M vs $21.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (94.5% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd., also known as simply Axalta, is an American company specializing in coatings in a wide variety of industrial applications, materials and sectors, including automotive paints. The company is based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and incorporated in Bermuda. Axalta develops and manufactures coatings for light and commercial vehicles, industrial, and refinish applications. The firm does business in 130 countries, has nearly 13,000 employees, and has more than 100,000 ...
Republic Services, Inc. is a North American waste disposal company whose services include non-hazardous solid waste collection, waste transfer, waste disposal, recycling, and energy services. It is the second largest provider of waste disposal in the United States after Waste Management. Its operations primarily consist of providing collection, transfer, and disposal of non-hazardous solid waste, recovering and recycling of certain materials, and energy services. The company is 35.
AXTA vs RSG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.1B | $4.1B |
| Net Profit | $91.0M | $544.7M |
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 19.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 6.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $1.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $91.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.0M | $544.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $549.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.0M | $549.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $495.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $512.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $565.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $511.5M |
| Q1 26 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 41.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.3% | 42.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | 42.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 41.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.28 | $1.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.51 | $1.76 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $1.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $1.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.63 | $1.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $1.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $1.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $608.0M | $76.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | $13.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $12.0B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $34.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | 1.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $608.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $657.0M | $76.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $606.0M | $84.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.0M | $122.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $575.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $593.0M | $74.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $840.0M | $490.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $12.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $11.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $11.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $12.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $11.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $11.0B |
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $34.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $33.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $33.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $32.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $31.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $31.9B |
| Q1 26 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | 1.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.48× | 1.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.50× | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.84× | 1.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.02× | 1.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $981.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $404.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 14.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $491.0M | $2.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | $981.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $234.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.0M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $286.0M | $404.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $737.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.0M | $702.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.0M | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.0M | $524.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $563.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.0M | $696.0M |
| Q1 26 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 17.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 10.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.73× | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 2.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | 2.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 1.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 2.15× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXTA
Segment breakdown not available.
RSG
| Other | $1.1B | 26% |
| Landfill Service Line | $780.0M | 19% |
| Collection Service Line Residential | $761.0M | 18% |
| Transfer Service Line | $458.0M | 11% |
| Environmental Solutions Service Line | $435.0M | 11% |
| Group3Segment | $423.0M | 10% |
| Other Service Line Sale Of Recycled Commodities | $104.0M | 3% |
| Other Service Line Other Noncore | $94.0M | 2% |
| Collection Service Line Other | $18.0M | 0% |
