vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AYTU BIOPHARMA, INC (AYTU) and FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP (FSP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $15.2M, roughly 1.7× AYTU BIOPHARMA, INC). FRANKLIN STREET PROPERTIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -28.1% vs -69.8%, a 41.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AYTU BIOPHARMA, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-6.5% vs -8.2%). AYTU BIOPHARMA, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($3.7M vs $-12.7M). Over the past eight quarters, AYTU BIOPHARMA, INC's revenue compounded faster (4.0% CAGR vs -8.7%).
AYTU BIOPHARMA, INCAYTUEarnings & Financial Report
Aytu BioPharma, Inc. is a US-based specialty pharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes a portfolio of consumer healthcare products and prescription therapeutics. Its key offerings cover cold and allergy treatments, sexual health solutions, and therapies for rare pediatric conditions, serving patients and healthcare providers across the United States.
Franklin Street Properties Corp is a Massachusetts-based real estate investment trust (REIT) in the United States. It primarily invests in, owns, and operates high-quality office properties across major U.S. metropolitan markets, serving corporate tenants across various industry segments, and delivers stable long-term returns via rental income and strategic asset management.
AYTU vs FSP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.2M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $-10.6M | $-7.3M |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | 59.4% |
| Operating Margin | -13.0% | -27.9% |
| Net Margin | -69.8% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.5% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1443.1% | 14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.05 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.9M | $27.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.5M | $27.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.2M | $28.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.6M | $29.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $31.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0M | $-21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $788.0K | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.6M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | $-7.6M |
| Q4 25 | 63.5% | 59.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.1% | 60.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.8% | 59.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.4% | 62.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.5% | 59.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.3% | 61.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 75.7% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.9% | 64.7% |
| Q4 25 | -13.0% | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -50.4% | -29.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | -78.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.4% | -29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.6% | -52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.6% | -68.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.4% | -24.0% |
| Q4 25 | -69.8% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | -30.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -130.9% | -29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | -79.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | -30.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -52.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -31.6% | -68.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -20.6% | -24.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.05 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.21 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.52 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $30.0M | $30.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $10.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.2M | $607.0M |
| Total Assets | $122.0M | $892.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.70× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $30.0M | $30.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.6M | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.0M | $29.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.2M | $30.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.4M | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $40.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $34.2M |
| Q4 25 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0 | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.2M | $607.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | $615.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.0M | $624.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.9M | $633.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.8M | $655.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | $665.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.7M | $682.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.8M | $703.9M |
| Q4 25 | $122.0M | $892.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.0M | $901.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.2M | $903.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.2M | $916.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.2M | $946.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.8M | $981.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $118.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.9M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.7M | $3.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $3.7M | $-12.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 24.1% | -48.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 63.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-25.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-618.0K | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.5M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $9.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-788.0K | $-648.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-254.0K | $-7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $3.7M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.5M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.8M |
| Q4 25 | 24.1% | -48.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.4% | -36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.9% | -57.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -50.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 63.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | 28.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.62× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.69× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
