vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ) and Qudian Inc. (HTT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $1.1M, roughly 1.4× Qudian Inc.). Qudian Inc. runs the higher net margin — 239.8% vs -90.4%, a 330.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Qudian Inc. is a China-based fintech service provider that mainly offers small consumer credit solutions, risk management technical services, and related digital financial products. Its core target users are young mass consumers across China, with all key business operations focused on the domestic Chinese market.
AZ vs HTT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $1.1M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $2.6M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 11.1% |
| Operating Margin | -265.9% | -121.7% |
| Net Margin | -90.4% | 239.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $559.9K | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $2.1M |
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-12.6M |
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -265.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -381.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -167.0% | -121.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -272.1% | -107.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -129.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -340.6% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -272.1% |
| Q3 25 | -90.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1085.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -224.7% | 239.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.4% | 187.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -131.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -612.3% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -588.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.2M | $104.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.3M | $225.2M |
| Total Assets | $81.9M | $246.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | $104.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.0K | $112.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $183.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $154.1M |
| Q3 25 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-504.0K | $225.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-340.0K | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $218.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $226.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $225.5M |
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | $246.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $227.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $234.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $249.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-658.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
