vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ) and MMTec, Inc. (MTC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5M vs $807.5K, roughly 1.9× MMTec, Inc.). A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. runs the higher net margin — -90.4% vs -5749.7%, a 5659.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
MMTec, Inc. is a global fintech enterprise that develops and delivers integrated trading technology solutions, including high-performance trading platforms, real-time market data services, and risk management systems. Its core clients cover brokerage firms, asset management institutions, and professional traders across North America and the Asia-Pacific region, helping financial market participants boost trading efficiency and operational security.
AZ vs MTC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $807.5K |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $-46.4M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -265.9% | -189.7% |
| Net Margin | -90.4% | -5749.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.84 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $807.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-46.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | 83.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | -265.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.9% | -189.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -381.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -167.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -272.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | -90.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1085.4% | -5749.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -224.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.2M | $10.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.3M | $-19.8M |
| Total Assets | $81.9M | $20.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $-19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-504.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-340.0K | — |
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $20.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-658.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
