vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP. (AZ) and Nano Labs Ltd (NA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Labs Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7M vs $1.5M, roughly 1.7× A2Z CUST2MATE SOLUTIONS CORP.). Nano Labs Ltd runs the higher net margin — 754.5% vs -90.4%, a 844.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Weebit Nano is a public semiconductor IP company founded in Israel in 2015 and headquartered in Hod HaSharon, Israel. The company develops Resistive Random-Access Memory technologies. Resistive Random-Access Memory is a specialized form of non-volatile memory (NVM) for the semiconductor industry. The company's products are targeted at a broad range of NVM markets where persistence, performance, and endurance are all required. ReRAM technology can be integrated in electronic devices like weara...
AZ vs NA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-1.4M | $20.3M |
| Gross Margin | 34.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -265.9% | — |
| Net Margin | -90.4% | 754.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.4% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.6M | $-985.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.2M | $-8.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -265.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -585.9% | -459.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -381.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -167.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -272.1% | -237.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 754.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -90.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1085.4% | -85.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -342.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -224.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.4% | -231.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.05 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $43.2M | $4.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $24.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $71.3M | $106.5M |
| Total Assets | $81.9M | $159.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.5M | $50.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $653.0K | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $22.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $106.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.5M | $86.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-504.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-340.0K | $-5.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $159.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $206.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $-8.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -312.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.9M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-658.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.7M | $-10.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -312.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -620.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -443.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 133.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
