vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTRAZENECA PLC (AZN) and T-Mobile US (TMUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
T-Mobile US is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.1B vs $14.5B, roughly 1.6× ASTRAZENECA PLC). ASTRAZENECA PLC runs the higher net margin — 16.9% vs 10.8%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ASTRAZENECA PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.7% vs 10.6%).
AstraZeneca plc (AZ) is a Swedish-British multinational pharmaceutical and biotechnology company with its headquarters at the Cambridge Biomedical Campus in Cambridge, UK. It has a portfolio of products for major diseases in areas including oncology, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, infection, neuroscience, respiratory, and inflammation.
T-Mobile US, Inc. is an American wireless network operator headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. Its majority shareholder and namesake is the German telecommunications company Deutsche Telekom. T-Mobile is the second largest wireless carrier in the United States, with 140 million subscribers as of September 30, 2025.
AZN vs TMUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.5B | $23.1B |
| Net Profit | $2.4B | $2.5B |
| Gross Margin | 82.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.3% | 20.8% |
| Net Margin | 16.9% | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.7% | 10.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.0% | -15.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.57 | $2.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $23.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $24.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5B | $21.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.9B | $19.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 82.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 83.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.3% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.2% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.9% | 14.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.27 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.89 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.57 | $2.84 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.56 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $2.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.1B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $86.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $44.8B | $55.9B |
| Total Assets | $112.4B | $214.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $6.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $86.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $86.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $78.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $55.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $59.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.8B | $61.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $61.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6B | $62.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $214.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $219.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $217.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $112.4B | $212.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $214.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $208.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $210.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.3B | $208.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $4.6B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.88× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $18.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.88× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZN
Segment breakdown not available.
TMUS
| Postpaid service revenues | $15.6B | 68% |
| Other | $7.5B | 32% |
