vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and Cricut, Inc. (CRCT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cricut, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($203.6M vs $148.6M, roughly 1.4× Azenta, Inc.). Cricut, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.8% vs -10.4%, a 14.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Azenta, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -2.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Cricut, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.3% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.
Cricut, Inc. is an American brand of cutting plotters, or computer-controlled cutting machines, designed for home crafters. The machines are used for cutting paper, felt, vinyl, fabric and other materials such as leather, matboard, and wood.
AZTA vs CRCT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.6M | $203.6M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | $7.8M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | 47.4% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 6.8% |
| Net Margin | -10.4% | 3.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | -2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.7% | -34.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $203.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | $170.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.9M | $172.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $162.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $209.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.6M | $167.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.3M | $167.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.4M | $167.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.0M | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $23.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-137.4M | $19.6M |
| Q4 25 | 42.9% | 47.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | 55.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | 60.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | 44.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 46.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 53.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | 54.7% |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.1% | 15.1% |
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.8% | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.25 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.48 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.6M | $275.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $343.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $580.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $336.6M | $275.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | $207.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | $376.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.6M | $356.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | $336.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.0M | $246.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.5M | $299.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $353.5M | $281.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $343.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $358.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $308.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $490.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $466.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $475.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $448.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $552.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $580.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $721.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $681.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $693.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $663.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $742.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $723.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.8M | $82.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 10.58× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $20.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $36.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $61.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $103.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | $70.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7M | $56.7M |
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZTA
| Multiomics | $67.2M | 45% |
| Core Products | $47.6M | 32% |
| Sample Repository Solutions | $33.8M | 23% |
CRCT
| Platform | $83.9M | 41% |
| Connected Machines | $65.2M | 32% |
| Accessories And Materials | $54.4M | 27% |
