vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. (GDYN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Azenta, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.6M vs $104.1M, roughly 1.4× GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.). GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -1.4% vs -10.4%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.7% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.0% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.
Escape Dynamics, Inc. was a Colorado-based technology company that operated 2010–2015 focused on bringing to market single-stage-to-orbit reusable electromagnetically powered spaceplanes.
AZTA vs GDYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.6M | $104.1M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | $-1.5M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | 34.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 61.7% |
| Net Margin | -10.4% | -1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 3.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.7% | -150.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $104.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | $104.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.9M | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $100.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $100.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.6M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.3M | $83.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $306.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.0M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $-817.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.9% | 34.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | 36.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 37.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 35.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 61.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | -0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.25 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.6M | $327.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $530.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $605.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $327.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.6M | $342.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | $338.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | $336.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.6M | $325.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | $334.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.0M | $231.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.5M | $256.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $530.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $542.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $537.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $532.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $517.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $517.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $400.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $388.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $612.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $613.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $608.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $590.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $592.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $477.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $443.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | $9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $10.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 32.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 5.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZTA
| Multiomics | $67.2M | 45% |
| Core Products | $47.6M | 32% |
| Sample Repository Solutions | $33.8M | 23% |
GDYN
Segment breakdown not available.
