vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and PagerDuty, Inc. (PD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Azenta, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.6M vs $124.5M, roughly 1.2× PagerDuty, Inc.). PagerDuty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 129.7% vs -10.4%, a 140.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PagerDuty, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs 0.8%). PagerDuty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.1M vs $14.7M). Over the past eight quarters, PagerDuty, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.
PagerDuty, Inc. is an American cloud computing company specializing in a SaaS incident management platform for IT operations departments.
AZTA vs PD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.6M | $124.5M |
| Net Profit | $-15.4M | $161.6M |
| Gross Margin | 42.9% | 85.3% |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -10.4% | 129.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -15.7% | 2827.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.34 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.6M | $124.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.2M | $123.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.9M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.3M | $121.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $147.4M | $118.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $150.6M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.3M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $136.4M | $111.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-15.4M | $161.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-48.0M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-47.7M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.6M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.6M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-137.4M | $-28.2M |
| Q4 25 | 42.9% | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.4% | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 46.2% | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.8% | 83.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.7% | 83.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 82.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.8% | 82.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.8% | 81.7% |
| Q4 25 | -4.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.3% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.7% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.1% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.1% | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | -10.4% | 129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.4% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -33.3% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | -15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.8% | -25.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.34 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.12 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.05 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.04 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.25 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.48 | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $336.6M | $547.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $320.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $336.6M | $547.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $279.8M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.0M | $597.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.6M | $570.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.5M | $542.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.0M | $599.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.5M | $592.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $353.5M | $571.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $484.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $320.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $129.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $111.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $891.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $926.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $927.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $866.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $916.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $924.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6B | $925.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.85× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $20.8M | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.7M | $24.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.9% | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.2% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.9M | $117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $20.8M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.8M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.4M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.7M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $14.7M | $24.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.7M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0M | $30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.5% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.1% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.04× | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AZTA
| Multiomics | $67.2M | 45% |
| Core Products | $47.6M | 32% |
| Sample Repository Solutions | $33.8M | 23% |
PD
| US | $88.8M | 71% |
| Non Us | $35.7M | 29% |
