vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Azenta, Inc. (AZTA) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.7M vs $148.6M, roughly 1.0× Azenta, Inc.). Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.5% vs -10.4%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs 0.8%). Azenta, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.7M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs 4.4%).

Azenta, was founded in 1978, and is based in Chelmsford, Massachusetts, United States. The company is a provider of life sciences services including genomics, cryogenic storage, automation, and informatics.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.

AZTA vs TARS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TARS
TARS
1.0× larger
TARS
$151.7M
$148.6M
AZTA
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TARS
TARS
+127.6% gap
TARS
128.4%
0.8%
AZTA
Higher net margin
TARS
TARS
4.9% more per $
TARS
-5.5%
-10.4%
AZTA
More free cash flow
AZTA
AZTA
$1.7M more FCF
AZTA
$14.7M
$13.0M
TARS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TARS
TARS
Annualised
TARS
134.4%
4.4%
AZTA

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Revenue
$148.6M
$151.7M
Net Profit
$-15.4M
$-8.4M
Gross Margin
42.9%
Operating Margin
-4.9%
-5.3%
Net Margin
-10.4%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
0.8%
128.4%
Net Profit YoY
-15.7%
63.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.34
$-0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$148.6M
$151.7M
Q3 25
$159.2M
$118.7M
Q2 25
$143.9M
$102.7M
Q1 25
$143.3M
$78.3M
Q4 24
$147.4M
$66.4M
Q3 24
$150.6M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$144.3M
$40.8M
Q1 24
$136.4M
$27.6M
Net Profit
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-15.4M
$-8.4M
Q3 25
$50.9M
$-12.6M
Q2 25
$-48.0M
$-20.3M
Q1 25
$-47.7M
$-25.1M
Q4 24
$-11.0M
$-23.1M
Q3 24
$-6.6M
$-23.4M
Q2 24
$-6.6M
$-33.3M
Q1 24
$-137.4M
$-35.7M
Gross Margin
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
42.9%
Q3 25
45.4%
Q2 25
46.2%
Q1 25
43.8%
Q4 24
46.7%
Q3 24
45.5%
Q2 24
44.8%
Q1 24
43.8%
Operating Margin
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
-4.9%
-5.3%
Q3 25
1.2%
-12.2%
Q2 25
-1.3%
-21.6%
Q1 25
-12.7%
-33.5%
Q4 24
-5.9%
-36.8%
Q3 24
-3.1%
-52.3%
Q2 24
-4.9%
-81.6%
Q1 24
-18.1%
-136.5%
Net Margin
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
-10.4%
-5.5%
Q3 25
32.0%
-10.6%
Q2 25
-33.4%
-19.8%
Q1 25
-33.3%
-32.1%
Q4 24
-7.5%
-34.8%
Q3 24
-4.4%
-48.7%
Q2 24
-4.5%
-81.6%
Q1 24
-100.8%
-129.4%
EPS (diluted)
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-0.34
$-0.17
Q3 25
$1.12
$-0.30
Q2 25
$-1.05
$-0.48
Q1 25
$-1.04
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-0.25
$-0.57
Q3 24
$-0.25
$-0.61
Q2 24
$-0.12
$-0.88
Q1 24
$-2.48
$-1.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$336.6M
$417.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$72.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.7B
$343.4M
Total Assets
$2.1B
$562.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$336.6M
$417.3M
Q3 25
$279.8M
$401.8M
Q2 25
$270.0M
$381.1M
Q1 25
$253.6M
$407.9M
Q4 24
$377.5M
$291.4M
Q3 24
$280.0M
$317.0M
Q2 24
$336.5M
$323.6M
Q1 24
$353.5M
$298.5M
Total Debt
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$72.4M
Q3 25
$72.3M
Q2 25
$72.1M
Q1 25
$72.0M
Q4 24
$71.8M
Q3 24
$71.7M
Q2 24
$71.6M
Q1 24
$29.9M
Stockholders' Equity
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$1.7B
$343.4M
Q3 25
$1.7B
$335.1M
Q2 25
$1.7B
$332.6M
Q1 25
$1.7B
$342.5M
Q4 24
$1.7B
$224.5M
Q3 24
$1.8B
$237.5M
Q2 24
$2.0B
$252.2M
Q1 24
$2.2B
$275.2M
Total Assets
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$2.1B
$562.2M
Q3 25
$2.1B
$534.6M
Q2 25
$2.0B
$495.0M
Q1 25
$2.0B
$500.8M
Q4 24
$2.0B
$377.0M
Q3 24
$2.1B
$376.3M
Q2 24
$2.3B
$376.8M
Q1 24
$2.6B
$349.3M
Debt / Equity
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
0.21×
Q3 25
0.22×
Q2 25
0.22×
Q1 25
0.21×
Q4 24
0.32×
Q3 24
0.30×
Q2 24
0.28×
Q1 24
0.11×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$20.8M
$19.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$14.7M
$13.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
9.9%
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.2%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$30.9M
$-22.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$20.8M
$19.3M
Q3 25
$2.2M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$25.8M
$-29.4M
Q1 25
$14.4M
$-20.7M
Q4 24
$29.8M
$-22.2M
Q3 24
$17.7M
$-8.7M
Q2 24
$9.8M
$-14.4M
Q1 24
$8.7M
$-37.8M
Free Cash Flow
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$14.7M
$13.0M
Q3 25
$-5.7M
$16.3M
Q2 25
$15.0M
$-30.4M
Q1 25
$7.0M
$-21.2M
Q4 24
$22.0M
$-22.3M
Q3 24
$8.3M
$-8.9M
Q2 24
$1.3M
$-15.4M
Q1 24
$428.0K
$-38.0M
FCF Margin
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
9.9%
8.6%
Q3 25
-3.6%
13.8%
Q2 25
10.4%
-29.6%
Q1 25
4.9%
-27.1%
Q4 24
15.0%
-33.5%
Q3 24
5.5%
-18.6%
Q2 24
0.9%
-37.8%
Q1 24
0.3%
-137.5%
Capex Intensity
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
4.2%
4.2%
Q3 25
4.9%
1.6%
Q2 25
7.5%
1.0%
Q1 25
5.2%
0.8%
Q4 24
5.3%
0.1%
Q3 24
6.2%
0.6%
Q2 24
5.9%
2.5%
Q1 24
6.1%
0.6%
Cash Conversion
AZTA
AZTA
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
Q3 25
0.04×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AZTA
AZTA

Multiomics$67.2M45%
Core Products$47.6M32%
Sample Repository Solutions$33.8M23%

TARS
TARS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons