vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BARRICK MINING CORP (B) and Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Canadian Solar Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.5B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.2× BARRICK MINING CORP). BARRICK MINING CORP runs the higher net margin — 34.1% vs 1.3%, a 32.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Barrick Mining Corporation is a mining company that produces gold and copper. It has mining operations and projects in Argentina, Canada, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Jamaica, Mali, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Tanzania, the United States and Zambia. In 2024, it produced 3.91 million ounces of gold at all-in sustaining costs of $1,484/ounce and 195,000 tonnes of copper at all-in sustaining costs of $3.45/pound. As of ...

Canadian Solar Inc. is a global renewable energy company. Headquartered in Kitchener, Ontario, the company manufactures solar PV modules, provides battery energy storage solutions and develops utility-scale solar power and battery energy storage projects.

B vs CSIQ — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
CSIQ
CSIQ
1.2× larger
CSIQ
$4.5B
$3.7B
B
Higher net margin
B
B
32.8% more per $
B
34.1%
1.3%
CSIQ

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Revenue
$3.7B
$4.5B
Net Profit
$1.3B
$57.6M
Gross Margin
49.0%
17.5%
Operating Margin
38.5%
2.2%
Net Margin
34.1%
1.3%
Revenue YoY
16.4%
Net Profit YoY
98.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.47

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
$4.5B
Q2 25
$3.7B
$3.0B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q3 24
$5.9B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$4.1B
Q2 23
$2.8B
Q1 23
$1.3B
Q2 22
$2.9B
Net Profit
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
$57.6M
Q2 25
$1.3B
$63.6M
Q1 25
$36.2M
Q3 24
$366.8M
Q2 24
$634.0M
$304.4M
Q2 23
$502.0M
Q1 23
$8.9M
Q2 22
$717.0M
Gross Margin
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
17.5%
Q2 25
49.0%
18.0%
Q1 25
19.0%
Q3 24
18.0%
Q2 24
37.4%
18.7%
Q2 23
31.6%
Q1 23
14.5%
Q2 22
35.3%
Operating Margin
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
2.2%
Q2 25
38.5%
3.3%
Q1 25
3.7%
Q3 24
7.7%
Q2 24
34.5%
9.1%
Q2 23
28.6%
Q1 23
1.2%
Q2 22
38.0%
Net Margin
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
1.3%
Q2 25
34.1%
2.1%
Q1 25
2.7%
Q3 24
6.2%
Q2 24
20.1%
7.5%
Q2 23
17.7%
Q1 23
0.7%
Q2 22
25.1%
EPS (diluted)
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
Q2 25
$0.47
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q2 24
$0.21
Q2 23
$0.17
Q1 23
Q2 22
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.8B
$1.7B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$33.4B
$3.9B
Total Assets
$47.3B
$13.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
$1.7B
Q2 25
$4.8B
$1.7B
Q1 25
$1.7B
Q3 24
$1.9B
Q2 24
$4.0B
$1.9B
Q2 23
$4.2B
Q1 23
$981.4M
Q2 22
$5.8B
Stockholders' Equity
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
$3.9B
Q2 25
$33.4B
$3.9B
Q1 25
$3.9B
Q3 24
$3.7B
Q2 24
$32.5B
$3.7B
Q2 23
$31.5B
Q1 23
$2.3B
Q2 22
$32.5B
Total Assets
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
$13.5B
Q2 25
$47.3B
$13.5B
Q1 25
$13.5B
Q3 24
$11.9B
Q2 24
$46.2B
$11.9B
Q2 23
$45.3B
Q1 23
$9.0B
Q2 22
$46.8B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.3B
$-187.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.06×
-3.26×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
$-187.7M
Q2 25
$1.3B
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q2 24
$1.2B
Q2 23
$832.0M
Q1 23
Q2 22
$924.0M
Cash Conversion
B
B
CSIQ
CSIQ
Q3 25
-3.26×
Q2 25
1.06×
Q1 25
Q3 24
Q2 24
1.83×
Q2 23
1.66×
Q1 23
Q2 22
1.29×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons