vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BARRICK MINING CORP (B) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TELUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.0× BARRICK MINING CORP). BARRICK MINING CORP runs the higher net margin — 34.1% vs -4.8%, a 38.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BARRICK MINING CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.4% vs 2.2%).

Barrick Mining Corporation is a mining company that produces gold and copper. It has mining operations and projects in Argentina, Canada, Chile, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Jamaica, Mali, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Tanzania, the United States and Zambia. In 2024, it produced 3.91 million ounces of gold at all-in sustaining costs of $1,484/ounce and 195,000 tonnes of copper at all-in sustaining costs of $3.45/pound. As of ...

Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...

B vs TU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TU
TU
1.0× larger
TU
$3.7B
$3.7B
B
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
B
B
+14.2% gap
B
16.4%
2.2%
TU
Higher net margin
B
B
38.9% more per $
B
34.1%
-4.8%
TU

Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025

Metric
B
B
TU
TU
Revenue
$3.7B
$3.7B
Net Profit
$1.3B
$-178.8M
Gross Margin
49.0%
90.2%
Operating Margin
38.5%
3.4%
Net Margin
34.1%
-4.8%
Revenue YoY
16.4%
2.2%
Net Profit YoY
98.1%
-210.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.47

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
$3.7B
$3.7B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$3.6B
Q2 23
$2.8B
Q2 22
$2.9B
Net Profit
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
$1.3B
$-178.8M
Q2 24
$634.0M
$161.3M
Q2 23
$502.0M
Q2 22
$717.0M
Gross Margin
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
49.0%
90.2%
Q2 24
37.4%
87.9%
Q2 23
31.6%
Q2 22
35.3%
Operating Margin
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
38.5%
3.4%
Q2 24
34.5%
13.7%
Q2 23
28.6%
Q2 22
38.0%
Net Margin
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
34.1%
-4.8%
Q2 24
20.1%
4.4%
Q2 23
17.7%
Q2 22
25.1%
EPS (diluted)
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
$0.47
Q2 24
$0.21
Q2 23
$0.17
Q2 22
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
B
B
TU
TU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.8B
$2.7B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$33.4B
$11.8B
Total Assets
$47.3B
$44.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
$4.8B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$4.0B
$676.7M
Q2 23
$4.2B
Q2 22
$5.8B
Stockholders' Equity
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
$33.4B
$11.8B
Q2 24
$32.5B
$12.4B
Q2 23
$31.5B
Q2 22
$32.5B
Total Assets
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
$47.3B
$44.3B
Q2 24
$46.2B
$41.8B
Q2 23
$45.3B
Q2 22
$46.8B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
B
B
TU
TU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.3B
$851.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.06×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
$1.3B
$851.2M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$1.0B
Q2 23
$832.0M
Q2 22
$924.0M
Cash Conversion
B
B
TU
TU
Q2 25
1.06×
Q2 24
1.83×
6.28×
Q2 23
1.66×
Q2 22
1.29×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons