vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Boeing (BA) and Ingram Micro Holding Corp (INGM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Boeing is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($22.2B vs $14.0B, roughly 1.6× Ingram Micro Holding Corp). Ingram Micro Holding Corp runs the higher net margin — 0.7% vs -0.0%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Boeing posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 13.7%). Ingram Micro Holding Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-962.3M vs $-1.5B). Over the past eight quarters, Boeing's revenue compounded faster (14.8% CAGR vs 11.0%).
The Boeing Company is an American multinational corporation that designs, manufactures, and sells airplanes, rotorcraft, rockets, satellites, and missiles worldwide. The company also provides leasing and product support services. Boeing is among the largest global aerospace manufacturers; it is the fourth-largest defense contractor in the world based on 2022 revenue and is the largest exporter in the United States by dollar value. Boeing was founded in 1916 by William E.
Ingram Micro Holding Corporation is an American distributor of information technology products and services. The company is based in Irvine, California, U.S. and has operations around the world. Founded as Micro D, Inc in 1979 in California by Geza Czige and Lorraine Mecca, the company, originally a traditional distributor focused on marketing, selling and shipping vendor products to resellers, is currently specializing on becoming a platform-based business that focuses on its digital experie...
BA vs INGM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $22.2B | $14.0B |
| Net Profit | $-7.0M | $98.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Net Margin | -0.0% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 77.4% | 42.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $22.2B | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $23.9B | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3B | $12.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.7B | $12.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.5B | $12.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8B | $11.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $11.5B |
| Q1 26 | $-7.0M | $98.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.2B | $121.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.3B | $99.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-611.0M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2B | $77.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.4B | $54.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.3% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | 2.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -20.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -24.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.5% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | -0.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -22.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -34.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.5% | 0.5% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.11 | $0.68 | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.70 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.14 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.92 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.50 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.97 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.33 | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $9.4B | $916.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.4B | $3.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.0B | $4.2B |
| Total Assets | $164.8B | $20.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 7.41× | 0.79× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $9.4B | $916.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.0B | $802.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.0B | $856.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.7B | $881.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | $849.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $44.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.6B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-23.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $-18.0B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | $164.8B | $20.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $168.2B | $21.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.0B | $19.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.1B | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $156.5B | $18.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $137.7B | $18.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $142.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.41× | 0.79× | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.37× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.5B | $-962.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.5% | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.0B | $53.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $-146.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $227.0M | $-298.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6B | $-200.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.3B | $-277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $-1.5B | $-962.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $375.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.0M | $-175.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-200.0M | $-333.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.3B | $-230.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0B | $-315.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | -6.5% | -6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | -2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -11.0% | -2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | 12.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -3.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BA
| Commercial Airplanes | $9.2B | 41% |
| Defense, Space & Security | $7.6B | 34% |
| Global Services | $5.4B | 24% |
INGM
Segment breakdown not available.
