vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH) and Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $129.0M, roughly 20.3× Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.). Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 1.5%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs -10.2%). Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($248.0M vs $8.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is the parent of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., an American company specializing in digital transformation and artificial intelligence. The company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, in the Washington metropolitan area, with 80 additional offices around the globe. Booz Allen's stated core business is to provide consulting, analysis, and engineering services to public- and private-sector organizations and nonprofits.
SLR Consulting is a privately owned international sustainability consultancy with offices in Europe, North America, South America, Australasia, and Africa. In 2019, it reported revenues of £150.8 million. Its purpose is ‘Making Sustainability Happen’, which it achieves through its global team of expert advisors and technicians, who partner with clients to tackle some of the world’s most complex sustainability challenges. Its ultimate owner is Solar Holdings Topco Limited.
BAH vs BWMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.6B | $129.0M |
| Net Profit | $200.0M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 3.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.2% | 13.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.0% | -66.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $113.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $113.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $104.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $94.9M |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.7M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.9M | $5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.1M | $771.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.2M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $-1.6M |
| Q4 25 | 51.9% | 55.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.6% | 51.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.2% | 53.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.7% | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.4% | 52.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | 50.6% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | -2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | -2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.63 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.16 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.45 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.01 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.97 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $882.0M | $11.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | $57.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $261.1M |
| Total Assets | $7.1B | $579.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.84× | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $882.0M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $816.0M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $711.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $885.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.7M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.7M | $23.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $554.3M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $32.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $36.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $38.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $26.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $261.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $996.0M | $261.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $249.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $244.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $246.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $243.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $235.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $167.3M |
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $510.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $538.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $528.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $505.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $497.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $463.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $420.5M |
| Q4 25 | 3.84× | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.98× | 0.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.74× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.99× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.79× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.83× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.14× | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.26× | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $261.0M | $9.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $248.0M | $8.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 6.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | 4.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $933.4M | $33.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.0M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.0M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.8M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $587.1M | $6.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.8M | $2.5M |
| Q4 25 | $248.0M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.0M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.4M | $11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.3M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.6M | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 4.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 8.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAH
| Defense Clients | $1.5B | 55% |
| Civil Clients | $732.0M | 28% |
| Intelligence Clients | $434.0M | 17% |
BWMN
Segment breakdown not available.
