vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH) and Fidelity National Information Services (FIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fidelity National Information Services is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.1× Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp). Fidelity National Information Services runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs 7.6%, a 10.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fidelity National Information Services posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.1% vs -10.2%). Fidelity National Information Services produced more free cash flow last quarter ($739.0M vs $248.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Fidelity National Information Services's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is the parent of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., an American company specializing in digital transformation and artificial intelligence. The company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, in the Washington metropolitan area, with 80 additional offices around the globe. Booz Allen's stated core business is to provide consulting, analysis, and engineering services to public- and private-sector organizations and nonprofits.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is an American multinational corporation which offers a wide range of financial products and services. FIS is most known for its development of Financial Technology, or FinTech. Annually, FIS facilitates the movement of roughly US$9 trillion through the processing of approximately 75 billion transactions in service to more than 20,000 clients around the globe.
BAH vs FIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.6B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $200.0M | $511.0M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 18.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 18.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.2% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.0% | 97.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $0.98 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $511.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.0M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.0M | $-470.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.7M | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.9M | $259.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.1M | $224.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.2M | $243.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $724.0M |
| Q4 25 | 51.9% | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.6% | 34.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.2% | 36.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.7% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.4% | 38.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | -18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 29.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.63 | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.16 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.45 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.01 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $0.44 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.97 | $1.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $882.0M | $599.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | $9.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $13.9B |
| Total Assets | $7.1B | $33.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.84× | 0.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $882.0M | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $816.0M | $571.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $711.0M | $581.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $885.0M | $805.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $554.3M | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $8.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $8.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $13.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $996.0M | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $15.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $15.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $18.0B |
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $33.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $33.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $33.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $32.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $33.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $34.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $34.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $35.9B |
| Q4 25 | 3.84× | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.98× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.74× | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.99× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.79× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.83× | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.14× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.26× | 0.59× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $261.0M | $758.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $248.0M | $739.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 26.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | 1.48× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $933.4M | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | $758.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.0M | $457.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.8M | $782.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $587.1M | $641.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.8M | $206.0M |
| Q4 25 | $248.0M | $739.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.0M | $952.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.4M | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | $764.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.3M | $605.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $530.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.6M | $179.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 21.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 3.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | 5.94× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 3.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 2.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 0.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAH
| Defense Clients | $1.5B | 55% |
| Civil Clients | $732.0M | 28% |
| Intelligence Clients | $434.0M | 17% |
FIS
| Banking Solutions | $1.6B | 57% |
| Other | $701.0M | 25% |
| Capital Market Solutions | $508.0M | 18% |
