vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH) and Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.6B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.1× Restaurant Brands International Inc.). Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs 6.3%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Restaurant Brands International Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.4% vs -10.2%). Restaurant Brands International Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($453.0M vs $248.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Restaurant Brands International Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (19.1% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is the parent of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., an American company specializing in digital transformation and artificial intelligence. The company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, in the Washington metropolitan area, with 80 additional offices around the globe. Booz Allen's stated core business is to provide consulting, analysis, and engineering services to public- and private-sector organizations and nonprofits.
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (RBI) is an American-Canadian multinational fast food holding company. It was formed in 2014 by the $12.5 billion merger between American fast food restaurant chain Burger King and Canadian coffee shop and restaurant chain Tim Hortons, and expanded by the purchases of Popeyes and Firehouse Subs in 2017 and 2021, respectively. The company is the fifth-largest operator of fast food restaurants in the world after Subway, McDonald's, Starbucks and Yum! Brands....
BAH vs QSR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.6B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $200.0M | $155.0M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 25.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.2% | 7.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.0% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $0.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $155.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.0M | $436.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.0M | $263.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.7M | $221.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.9M | $361.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.1M | $357.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.2M | $399.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $328.0M |
| Q4 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | 65.2% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 27.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 27.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 31.3% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 18.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.63 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.16 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.45 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.01 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.97 | $0.72 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $882.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | $13.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $3.6B |
| Total Assets | $7.1B | $25.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.84× | 3.65× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $882.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $816.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $711.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $885.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $554.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $13.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $13.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | $13.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $12.9B |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $996.0M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $25.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $25.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $25.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $24.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $24.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $25.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $24.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $23.1B |
| Q4 25 | 3.84× | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.98× | 3.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.74× | 4.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.99× | 4.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.79× | 4.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.83× | 4.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.14× | 4.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.26× | 4.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $261.0M | $555.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $248.0M | $453.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 18.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 4.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | 3.58× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $933.4M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.0M | $592.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.0M | $449.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.8M | $481.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $587.1M | $540.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $334.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.8M | $148.0M |
| Q4 25 | $248.0M | $453.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.0M | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $411.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.4M | $54.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | $404.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.3M | $485.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.6M | $122.0M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 7.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 3.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 1.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 0.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAH
| Defense Clients | $1.5B | 55% |
| Civil Clients | $732.0M | 28% |
| Intelligence Clients | $434.0M | 17% |
QSR
| CA | $1.0B | 41% |
| Other | $330.0M | 13% |
| Advertising | $308.0M | 12% |
| Others | $284.0M | 12% |
| Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen | $195.0M | 8% |
| Burger King | $185.0M | 8% |
| Royalty | $87.0M | 4% |
| Firehouse Subs | $59.0M | 2% |
| Franchisor | $7.0M | 0% |
