vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp (BAH) and SOUTHERN COPPER CORP (SCCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $2.6B, roughly 1.5× Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp). SOUTHERN COPPER CORP runs the higher net margin — 33.9% vs 7.6%, a 26.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOUTHERN COPPER CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.0% vs -10.2%). SOUTHERN COPPER CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.1B vs $248.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SOUTHERN COPPER CORP's revenue compounded faster (22.0% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation is the parent of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., an American company specializing in digital transformation and artificial intelligence. The company is headquartered in McLean, Virginia, in the Washington metropolitan area, with 80 additional offices around the globe. Booz Allen's stated core business is to provide consulting, analysis, and engineering services to public- and private-sector organizations and nonprofits.
Southern Copper Corporation, organized in Delaware and headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, owns copper mines, smelters, and refineries in Peru and Mexico, including the Cuajone mine, the Toquepala mine, and the Tia Maria mine in Peru and the Buenavista mine and the La Caridad Mine in Mexico. In 2024, the company mined 2.1 billion pounds of copper, 21 million ounces of silver, 64 million pounds of molybdenum, and 286 million pounds of zinc.
BAH vs SCCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.6B | $3.9B |
| Net Profit | $200.0M | $1.3B |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 62.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 54.5% |
| Net Margin | 7.6% | 33.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.2% | 39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.0% | 64.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | $200.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $175.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.0M | $976.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.7M | $949.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.9M | $796.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $390.1M | $899.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $165.2M | $953.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.0M | $738.8M |
| Q4 25 | 51.9% | 62.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.6% | 59.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.3% | 60.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.6% | 57.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.2% | 56.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.7% | 58.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 53.4% | 59.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | 55.5% |
| Q4 25 | 8.8% | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | 52.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 52.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 49.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.0% | 47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.4% | 49.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 51.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 45.8% |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | 32.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 32.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 30.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | $1.63 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.42 | $1.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.16 | $1.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $1.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.45 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.01 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $1.22 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.97 | $0.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $882.0M | $4.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.9B | $6.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $11.0B |
| Total Assets | $7.1B | $21.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.84× | 0.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $882.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $816.0M | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $711.0M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $885.0M | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.7M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $297.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $554.3M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $6.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $996.0M | $10.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $7.5B |
| Q4 25 | $7.1B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.2B | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $19.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.9B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6B | $17.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6B | $16.8B |
| Q4 25 | 3.84× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.74× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.79× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.83× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.14× | 0.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.26× | 0.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $261.0M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $248.0M | $1.1B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.5% | 27.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 10.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.30× | 1.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $933.4M | $3.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $261.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $421.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.0M | $976.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $219.0M | $721.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $587.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.1M | $962.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.8M | $659.7M |
| Q4 25 | $248.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $395.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.0M | $741.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $194.4M | $403.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $133.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | $630.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $127.6M | $445.9M |
| Q4 25 | 9.5% | 27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.7% | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 40.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 40.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | 17.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 8.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.14× | 0.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.81× | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.32× | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 0.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAH
| Defense Clients | $1.5B | 55% |
| Civil Clients | $732.0M | 28% |
| Intelligence Clients | $434.0M | 17% |
SCCO
| Other | $1.3B | 32% |
| MX | $726.4M | 19% |
| CH | $560.4M | 14% |
| PE | $218.8M | 6% |
| Silver | $201.1M | 5% |
| BR | $157.9M | 4% |
| CL | $149.0M | 4% |
| Molybdenum | $143.3M | 4% |
| ES | $130.8M | 3% |
| Mexican IMMSA Unit | $129.8M | 3% |
| IT | $107.1M | 3% |
| Zinc | $88.8M | 2% |
