vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hubbell Incorporated is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.1× Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.). Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 43.8% vs 14.6%, a 29.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.8% vs 11.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (30.5% CAGR vs 3.3%).
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is a Canadian-American alternative asset manager. The company was founded in December 2022 as a spin-off of the asset management operations of Brookfield Corporation, and manages investments across real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, private equity, and credit markets globally.
Hubbell Incorporated, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, is an American company that designs, manufactures, and sells electrical and electronic products for non-residential and residential construction, industrial, and utility applications. Hubbell was founded by Harvey Hubbell as a proprietorship in 1888, and was incorporated in Connecticut in 1905.
BAM vs HUBB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $586.0M | $217.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 20.3% |
| Net Margin | 43.8% | 14.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 23.8% | 11.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | 10.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.38 | $4.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $974.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $931.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $873.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $821.0M | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $586.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $615.0M | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.0M | $255.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $584.0M | $244.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.0M | $169.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $537.0M | $219.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.0M | $213.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 35.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 84.2% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.1% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.0% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.5% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.4% | 20.7% |
| Q1 26 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.0% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.5% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.0M | $497.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.6M | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $17.9M | $8.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $497.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $680.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.0M | $399.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.0M | $360.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $345.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $445.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $406.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.0B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.63× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $447.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $388.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 26.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.06× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $874.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $562.0M | $447.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $745.0M | $284.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $529.0M | $260.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.0M | $37.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $432.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.0M | $239.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $388.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $220.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $364.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $188.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $205.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | 1.07× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.52× | 0.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 1.12× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAM
| Management and incentive fee revenues | $990.0M | 74% |
| Other revenues | $236.0M | 18% |
| Other | $112.0M | 8% |
HUBB
| Grid Infrastructure | $717.0M | 48% |
| Industrial | $393.7M | 26% |
| Grid Automation | $218.9M | 15% |
| Electrical Products | $163.1M | 11% |
