vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (BANC) and FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC (FELE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($500.4M vs $286.9M, roughly 1.7× BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.). BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC. runs the higher net margin — 25.1% vs 6.9%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.9% vs 7.9%). Over the past eight quarters, FRANKLIN ELECTRIC CO INC's revenue compounded faster (-4.0% CAGR vs -23.7%).
BANC OF CALIFORNIA, INC.BANCEarnings & Financial Report
Banc of California is an American bank with 80 branches in California, as well as locations in Denver, Colorado, and Durham, North Carolina. The bank is headquartered in Los Angeles, California, with about 2,000 employees nationwide including in New York and Chicago. Banc of California offers a broad range of loan and deposit products and services, focusing on providing banking and treasury management services to small-, middle-market, and venture-backed businesses.
Franklin Electric Co., Inc. is a manufacturer and distributor of products and systems focused on the movement and management of water and energy. The company offers pumps, motors, drives, and controls for use in a variety of residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, and municipal applications. Headquartered in Fort Wayne, Indiana, the company also operates manufacturing facilities in the United States, Germany, Czech Republic, Italy, Turkey, Mexico, Brazil, Australia, South Africa, C...
BANC vs FELE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $286.9M | $500.4M |
| Net Profit | $72.0M | $34.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 9.6% |
| Net Margin | 25.1% | 6.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | 9.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 34.3% | 10.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.77 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $286.9M | $500.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $458.5M | $506.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $466.8M | $581.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $453.1M | $587.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $440.3M | $455.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.5M | $485.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.4M | $531.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $492.4M | $543.3M |
| Q1 26 | $72.0M | $34.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $77.4M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.6M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | $60.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.6M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.9M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8M | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.3M | $59.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 15.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.5% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 14.6% |
| Q1 26 | 25.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.2% | 10.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.39 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.38 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.12 | $1.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.29 | $0.73 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $1.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.2B | $80.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $134.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $34.7B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $80.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $102.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $220.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $134.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $135.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $135.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $14.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $87.2M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $34.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $33.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.2B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.58× | 0.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.58× | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.56× | 0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | 0.01× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.40× | 0.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.46× | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.42× | 0.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
