vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) and Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bandwidth Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($208.8M vs $182.4M, roughly 1.1× Climb Global Solutions, Inc.). Bandwidth Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.9% vs 1.8%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Climb Global Solutions, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.1% vs 20.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Climb Global Solutions, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (40.7% CAGR vs 9.7%).
Bandwidth Inc. is a communications platform as a service company. It sells software application programming interfaces for voice, text messaging and emergency services, using its own global IP voice network.
Univar Solutions Inc. is a global chemical and ingredients distributor and provider of value-added services.
BAND vs CLMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $208.8M | $182.4M |
| Net Profit | $4.0M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | 37.3% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 60.5% | 2.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.1% | 32.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.0% | -9.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $208.8M | $182.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $207.7M | $193.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.9M | $161.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.2M | $138.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $210.0M | $161.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.9M | $119.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.6M | $92.1M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $413.0K | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $3.4M |
| Q1 26 | 37.3% | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | 15.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.0% | 16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 20.2% |
| Q1 26 | 60.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.5% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.08 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $1.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | $1.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | $1.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $1.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $1.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.3M | $41.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.7M | $118.4M |
| Total Assets | $984.2M | $458.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $47.3M | $41.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $36.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.4M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.1M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.7M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.8M | $29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.4M | $48.4M |
| Q1 26 | $405.7M | $118.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $400.0M | $116.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.7M | $109.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.5M | $105.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.4M | $95.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $90.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $336.6M | $87.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.4M | $79.8M |
| Q1 26 | $984.2M | $458.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $460.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $376.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $420.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $964.4M | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $989.2M | $469.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $371.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $302.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $22.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.7M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.1M | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.5M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.4M | $7.3M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.37× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.55× | -0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.03× | 2.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
