vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trip.com Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($304.6M vs $208.8M, roughly 1.5× Bandwidth Inc.). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs 1.9%, a 25.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Bandwidth Inc. is a communications platform as a service company. It sells software application programming interfaces for voice, text messaging and emergency services, using its own global IP voice network.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
BAND vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $208.8M | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $4.0M | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | 37.3% | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | 60.5% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.9% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 200.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $208.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $207.7M | $304.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $180.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $174.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $210.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $173.6M | $242.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $413.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $73.8M |
| Q1 26 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.6% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.3% | 81.8% |
| Q1 26 | 60.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.5% | 27.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 30.4% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.10 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.17 | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.3M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.7M | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | $984.2M | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $47.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $111.3M | $10.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.4M | $12.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | $405.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $400.0M | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $392.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $336.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $307.4M | $18.1B |
| Q1 26 | $984.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $36.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $964.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $989.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $34.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.03× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAND
Segment breakdown not available.
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
