vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bark, Inc. (BARK) and Cineverse Corp. (CNVS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bark, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($98.4M vs $16.3M, roughly 6.0× Cineverse Corp.). Cineverse Corp. runs the higher net margin — -8.8% vs -5.4%, a 3.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bark, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-22.1% vs -60.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Cineverse Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (28.5% CAGR vs -10.0%).
Flying Bark Productions Pty. Ltd. is an Australian entertainment and animation studio that is a subsidiary of Belgian production company Studio 100. The studio acts as a full-service production facility across feature films, television and an assorted range of digital content. The studio was established by Yoram and Sandra Gross in 1967 as Yoram Gross Film Studios, and its stake was acquired by Australian media group Village Roadshow in 1996 before their stake was sold to German media & enter...
Cineverse Corp. is an American entertainment company headquartered in Los Angeles, California. Cineverse’s businesses encompass digital cinema, streaming channels, content marketing, and distribution.
BARK vs CNVS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2026 vs Q3 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $98.4M | $16.3M |
| Net Profit | $-8.6M | $-875.0K |
| Gross Margin | 62.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9.1% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | -8.8% | -5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -22.1% | -60.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.9% | -112.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.05 | $-0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $98.4M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $107.0M | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.4M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.4M | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.1M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $116.2M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $121.5M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | $-875.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.7M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.0M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.1M | $856.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.9M | $-14.7M |
| Q4 25 | 62.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | -9.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.0% | -43.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.1% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.7% | 23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.1% | -30.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | -141.9% |
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.0% | -44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.8% | -31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.1% | 17.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.2% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.6% | -33.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.0% | -148.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.04 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.07 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $-1.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $21.7M | $2.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $81.2M | $38.6M |
| Total Assets | $188.7M | $68.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $21.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.0M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $6.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $115.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $125.5M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $81.2M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $86.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.0M | $37.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.5M | $38.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.0M | $37.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.6M | $29.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $128.1M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.4M | $33.3M |
| Q4 25 | $188.7M | $68.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $248.0M | $61.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $260.0M | $61.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.6M | $72.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $292.2M | $80.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $301.6M | $60.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $287.7M | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $298.6M | $64.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.32× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.29× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7M | $-1.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.4M | $-14.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $12.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.4M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.8M | $-85.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $966.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-251.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BARK
| Toys Accessories | $46.0M | 47% |
| Consumables | $30.2M | 31% |
| Commerce Segment | $18.9M | 19% |
| Other | $3.4M | 3% |
CNVS
| OTT Streamingand Digital | $11.5M | 71% |
| Base Distribution | $3.5M | 22% |
| Podcast And Other | $1.3M | 8% |