vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BATTALION OIL CORP (BATL) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.2M vs $31.6M, roughly 1.1× BATTALION OIL CORP). BATTALION OIL CORP runs the higher net margin — 5.7% vs -130.4%, a 136.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Voyager Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.1% vs -36.1%).
Battalion Oil Corp is an independent energy company engaged in the exploration, development, and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It primarily operates assets in the Eagle Ford Shale region of South Texas, serving commercial and industrial clients across North American energy markets.
BATL vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $31.6M | $35.2M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-45.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | -4.4% |
| Operating Margin | -33.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 5.7% | -130.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -36.1% | 2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 108.1% | -64.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.77 | $-0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.6M | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.4M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.6M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-735.0K | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-105.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.4% | -52.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -130.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | -70.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | -68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -44.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.75 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.77 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.91 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.21 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.47 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.53 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.0M | $429.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $208.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-32.8M | $404.5M |
| Total Assets | $460.7M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $429.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.0M | $491.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.5M | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.6M | $468.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $73.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $208.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $225.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $162.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $147.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-32.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.3M | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.2M | $554.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $460.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $491.7M | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $498.8M | $685.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $506.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $431.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $458.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $487.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.35× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.8M | $-39.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-66.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -189.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -6.58× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-263.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.8M | $-60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | $-30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $-66.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-54.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -189.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.58× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.23× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BATL
| Oil | $28.6M | 91% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $3.9M | 12% |
VOYG
Segment breakdown not available.
