vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Baxter International (BAX) and TRINITY BIOTECH PLC (TRIB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Baxter International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $30.5M, roughly 97.4× TRINITY BIOTECH PLC). TRINITY BIOTECH PLC runs the higher net margin — -33.0% vs -37.9%, a 5.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Baxter International Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company with headquarters in Deerfield, Illinois.
Trinity Biotech PLC develops, manufactures and markets diagnostic test kits and systems for clinical laboratories and point-of-care settings. Its product portfolio covers diabetes management, infectious diseases, cardiac health, autoimmune disorders and coagulation, with core markets across North America, Europe and emerging economies.
BAX vs TRIB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $30.5M |
| Net Profit | $-1.1B | $-10.1M |
| Gross Margin | 19.4% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | -23.2% |
| Net Margin | -37.9% | -33.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 458.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -120.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.21 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $533.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8B | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-46.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-512.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-314.0M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.5% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -24.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.0% | -23.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | -37.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -96.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.2% | -33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-2.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.99 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.0B | $5.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.1B | $-29.4M |
| Total Assets | $20.1B | $94.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.55× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6B | $-29.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $20.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3B | $94.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.36× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $584.0M | $-3.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -13.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-4.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $237.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $217.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-193.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $488.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $253.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.38× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.53× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAX
| Other | $1.5B | 51% |
| Infusion Therapies And Technologies | $543.0M | 18% |
| Pharmaceutical Compounding | $316.0M | 11% |
| Front Line Care | $219.0M | 7% |
| Injectables And Anesthesia | $190.0M | 6% |
| Advanced Surgery | $177.0M | 6% |
TRIB
Segment breakdown not available.
