vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Baxter International (BAX) and Veralto (VLTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Baxter International is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.9× Veralto). Veralto runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -0.6%, a 18.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Veralto posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.8% vs 3.0%). Veralto produced more free cash flow last quarter ($170.0M vs $76.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Veralto's revenue compounded faster (6.8% CAGR vs -15.8%).

Baxter International Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company with headquarters in Deerfield, Illinois.

Veralto Corporation is an American technology company headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It produces products related to water analytics, water treatment, marking and coding, and packaging and color.

BAX vs VLTO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BAX
BAX
1.9× larger
BAX
$2.7B
$1.4B
VLTO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
VLTO
VLTO
+3.8% gap
VLTO
6.8%
3.0%
BAX
Higher net margin
VLTO
VLTO
18.4% more per $
VLTO
17.9%
-0.6%
BAX
More free cash flow
VLTO
VLTO
$94.0M more FCF
VLTO
$170.0M
$76.0M
BAX
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
VLTO
VLTO
Annualised
VLTO
6.8%
-15.8%
BAX

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Revenue
$2.7B
$1.4B
Net Profit
$-15.0M
$254.0M
Gross Margin
33.0%
60.1%
Operating Margin
2.4%
23.8%
Net Margin
-0.6%
17.9%
Revenue YoY
3.0%
6.8%
Net Profit YoY
12.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.36
$1.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$2.7B
$1.4B
Q4 25
$3.0B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$2.8B
$1.4B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$2.6B
Q4 24
$533.0M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$2.7B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$3.8B
$1.3B
Net Profit
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$-15.0M
$254.0M
Q4 25
$-1.1B
$239.0M
Q3 25
$-46.0M
$222.0M
Q2 25
$91.0M
$225.0M
Q1 25
$126.0M
Q4 24
$-512.0M
$227.0M
Q3 24
$140.0M
$219.0M
Q2 24
$-314.0M
$203.0M
Gross Margin
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
33.0%
60.1%
Q4 25
19.4%
60.1%
Q3 25
33.5%
60.0%
Q2 25
35.3%
60.4%
Q1 25
32.8%
Q4 24
25.0%
59.6%
Q3 24
38.3%
59.6%
Q2 24
37.5%
60.1%
Operating Margin
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
2.4%
23.8%
Q4 25
-24.5%
23.2%
Q3 25
6.1%
22.8%
Q2 25
6.8%
24.2%
Q1 25
2.2%
Q4 24
-25.5%
22.9%
Q3 24
5.7%
23.4%
Q2 24
-5.0%
23.2%
Net Margin
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
-0.6%
17.9%
Q4 25
-37.9%
17.0%
Q3 25
-1.6%
16.2%
Q2 25
3.2%
16.9%
Q1 25
4.8%
Q4 24
-96.1%
16.9%
Q3 24
5.2%
16.7%
Q2 24
-8.2%
15.8%
EPS (diluted)
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$0.36
$1.02
Q4 25
$-2.21
$0.95
Q3 25
$-0.09
$0.89
Q2 25
$0.18
$0.90
Q1 25
$0.25
Q4 24
$-0.99
$0.91
Q3 24
$0.27
$0.88
Q2 24
$-0.62
$0.81

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$182.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$76.0M
$170.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.8%
12.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.1%
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.72×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$893.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$182.0M
Q4 25
$584.0M
$270.0M
Q3 25
$237.0M
$339.0M
Q2 25
$217.0M
$157.0M
Q1 25
$-193.0M
Q4 24
$488.0M
$285.0M
Q3 24
$253.0M
$224.0M
Q2 24
$115.0M
$251.0M
Free Cash Flow
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
$76.0M
$170.0M
Q4 25
$258.0M
Q3 25
$323.0M
Q2 25
$142.0M
Q1 25
Q4 24
$263.0M
Q3 24
$215.0M
Q2 24
$240.0M
FCF Margin
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
2.8%
12.0%
Q4 25
18.4%
Q3 25
23.6%
Q2 25
10.7%
Q1 25
Q4 24
19.6%
Q3 24
16.4%
Q2 24
18.6%
Capex Intensity
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
5.1%
0.8%
Q4 25
0.9%
Q3 25
1.2%
Q2 25
1.1%
Q1 25
Q4 24
1.6%
Q3 24
0.7%
Q2 24
0.9%
Cash Conversion
BAX
BAX
VLTO
VLTO
Q1 26
0.72×
Q4 25
1.13×
Q3 25
1.53×
Q2 25
2.38×
0.70×
Q1 25
-1.53×
Q4 24
1.26×
Q3 24
1.81×
1.02×
Q2 24
1.24×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons