vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BLACKBERRY Ltd (BB) and AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. (FOLD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($185.2M vs $141.8M, roughly 1.3× BLACKBERRY Ltd). BLACKBERRY Ltd runs the higher net margin — 9.7% vs 0.9%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.7% vs -0.8%). BLACKBERRY Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($17.4M vs $16.0M). Over the past eight quarters, AMICUS THERAPEUTICS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (29.5% CAGR vs 17.8%).
BlackBerry Limited, formerly Research In Motion (RIM), is a Canadian software company specializing in secure communications and the Internet of Things (IoT). Founded in 1984, it developed the BlackBerry brand of two-way pagers, smartphones, and tablets. The company later transitioned to providing software and services and holds critical software application patents.
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is a public American biopharmaceutical company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The company went public in 2007 under the Nasdaq trading symbol FOLD. This followed a 2006 planned offering and subsequent withdrawal, which would have established the trading symbol as AMTX Prior to their IPO, Amicus was funded by a variety of venture capital firms including Radius Ventures, Canaan Partners and New Enterprise Associates.
BB vs FOLD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $141.8M | $185.2M |
| Net Profit | $13.7M | $1.7M |
| Gross Margin | 77.5% | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | 9.7% | 0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.8% | 23.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 224.5% | -88.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.02 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $141.8M | $185.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.6M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.7M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $141.7M | $125.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $143.6M | $149.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.2M | $141.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $123.4M | $126.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $102.1M | $110.4M |
| Q4 25 | $13.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.4M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.5M | $14.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-19.7M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-41.4M | $-15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-56.2M | $-48.4M |
| Q4 25 | 77.5% | 85.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 74.5% | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.2% | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 73.5% | 90.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.1% | 90.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.2% | 90.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.9% | 91.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.6% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.6% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.0% | -25.1% |
| Q4 25 | 9.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | -15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.2% | -17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -15.6% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.5% | -12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -55.0% | -43.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.02 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.02 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.02 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.08 | $-0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $304.2M | $293.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $196.2M | $392.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $741.1M | $274.2M |
| Total Assets | $1.2B | $949.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.26× | 1.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $304.2M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $290.5M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $306.6M | $231.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $337.8M | $250.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $220.0M | $249.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $211.0M | $249.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $229.0M | $260.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $237.1M | $239.6M |
| Q4 25 | $196.2M | $392.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $195.9M | $392.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $195.6M | $391.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $195.3M | $390.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $390.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $389.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $194.1M | $388.4M |
| Q4 25 | $741.1M | $274.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $230.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $725.1M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $719.9M | $193.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $725.2M | $194.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $732.1M | $178.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $742.6M | $132.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $775.1M | $130.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $949.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $868.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $815.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $789.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $786.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $749.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $721.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.26× | 1.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.27× | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.27× | 1.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.27× | 2.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.25× | 2.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.3M | $16.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $17.4M | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.3% | 8.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.6% | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.34× | 9.62× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $42.8M | $29.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $35.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.0M | $-26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.0M | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.1M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.5M | $-29.7M |
| Q4 25 | $17.4M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-18.9M | $-28.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.2M | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.5M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.5M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.6M | $-31.5M |
| Q4 25 | 12.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.5% | -18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -13.1% | -16.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.2% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.34× | 9.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.29× | 2.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.47× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.27× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BB
| QNX | $68.7M | 48% |
| Secure Communication | $67.0M | 47% |
| Licensing | $6.1M | 4% |
FOLD
| Other | $105.8M | 57% |
| Galafold | $64.8M | 35% |
| Pombiliti Opfolda | $14.6M | 8% |